Arizona Lawmakers Call for Resolution to Hold Back Electoral College Votes


At a public hearing in Arizona with select members of the state legislature and members of President Donald Trump’s legal team, lawmakers called for their colleagues to support an upcoming resolution that would delay the release of the state’s Electoral College votes.

Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem told reporters during the Nov. 30 hearing that they hope to have a resolution “within the next 24 to 48 hours.” The state holds 11 Electoral College votes.

“We are clawing our Electoral College votes back, we will not release them,” Finchem said. “That’s what I’m calling on our colleagues in both the House and Senate to do—exercise our plenary authority under the U.S. Constitution.

“There is a legal brief out there that says we are not tethered to state statute when it comes to this one question.”

According to Finchem, the move would be easy to make and would be legally binding.

“A simple majority can call the House and Senate back, and in a day can pass a resolution and cause those electoral votes to basically be held,” he said. “And it is binding—I’ll see y’all in court.”

In total, nine Republican state lawmakers attended the meeting, which was held at a hotel in downtown Phoenix. They had requested permission to hold a formal legislative hearing at the state Capitol but were denied by the Republican House speaker and Senate president, according to The Associated Press.

Trump’s attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, alongside witnesses, appeared in front of members of the Arizona Legislature alleging that considerable voter fraud occurred in the state. They also pushed for the Republican-majority state House and Senate to hold a vote on the certification of the election.

During the hearing, a cybersecurity expert said the user manual for Dominion Voting Systems machines guides users on how to connect to the internet, and that the machines, used by multiple states, were connected to the internet during the election.

“The Dominion suite user manual is about an inch and a half thick. My team went back through the user manual and looked at all the instances where in the user’s manual, it tells operators to connect the ethernet cords to the router, and it is, the systems are connected to the internet,” said Phil Waldron, a cybersecurity expert and retired Army colonel.

“Our teams looked at spirographs on the Dominion network on Election Day and showed the increased web traffic, internet traffic on Election Day for Dominion servers.

“In a nutshell, these systems are not what you’ve been told, if you’ve been told anything.

“They are connected to the internet. There is no transparency of how the voter information is processed, moved, and stored. And, as a matter of fact, these companies have refused to allow any type of inspection into their code and they always decry, it’s our IP, it’s IP protection.”

In 2016, Trump won the state’s 11 electoral votes by less than 100,000 votes. In the 17 presidential elections between 1952 and 2016, only one Democratic candidate won Arizona—Bill Clinton in 1996.

Arizona’s secretary of state on Nov. 30 certified the state’s presidential election results. Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, said in a press conference that despite the pandemic and other complexities, “we had an extremely well-run election and saw historically high voter participation.”

During the hearing, a volunteer poll observer and worker in Arizona’s Pima County told Republican Arizona state legislators that she had been told by state election officials to allow people to vote who may not have been properly registered to vote in Arizona on Election Day.

“I was having to allow people to vote who literally had just moved here. A large percentage had addresses from two apartment complexes,” poll observer Anna Orth said.

Orth said “many” of these individuals were “residents for not more than a month,” adding that from her observations, she estimated that about 2,000 people appeared to be out-of-state voters.

According to Pima County’s elections website, people can vote if they have lived within Pima County “at least 29 days prior to the general election.”

These people, she said, had out-of-state driver’s licenses but attempted to show proof they could vote by presenting a utility bill that suggested they lived in the precinct.

Orth then alleged she had spoken to a poll observer who said he was from Los Angeles and told her “he was there to turn Arizona blue,” meaning Democratic.

She said the man told her: “We’re here specifically to turn this precinct blue. This is one of our problem ones. I came from another precinct in Maricopa [County].” There was a group of them there, she added.

The man’s job, Orth said, was to make sure that anyone who was turned away from voting could vote. When questioned further, the man allegedly said he is in contact with several lawyers to make sure of that, according to Orth, who said she submitted an affidavit about her claims under penalty of perjury.

Also, on Nov. 24, the head of the Arizona Republican Party filed a petition for early inspection of mail-in-ballot envelopes and signatures. The court petition against the 11 Arizona Democrat presidential electors also seeks inspection of duplicate ballots with their originals in Maricopa County.

The petition was filed by Arizona Republican Party chairwoman Kelli Ward.

“A formal legal elections challenge is expected to be filed soon alleging that the process used to validate ballots returned by mail was legally insufficient,” the Arizona Republican Party said in a statement. “The critical process of verifying a signature determines whether a vote is counted.”

Selecting Electors

At the hearing, Trump’s lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis pushed for the GOP-majority state House and Senate to hold a vote on the certification of the election.

“Your political career is worth losing to save the right to vote in America,” Giuliani told the Republican senators. “At times in our history, men and women stepped forward to defend Americans’ rights and liberties.”

The U.S. Constitution, Giuliani said, stipulates that state legislatures have the authority to certify a state’s electors.

“You, the legislature of Arizona, have the plenary power to regulate the selection of electors in a presidential election,” he said, adding that the Supreme Court has ruled that state houses and senates can reclaim the power to name electors.

“I don’t see how a decent, honest person could let this happen.”

Ellis said the president’s campaign wasn’t asking the legislature to overturn the results of the election, but to rather, not certify allegedly fraudulent results.

The office of Arizona’s secretary of state didn’t respond to a request for comment by press time. Previously, Hobbs said she had seen no evidence of irregularities or fraud in the election that could overturn the results of the election.

Current data shows Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden leading Trump by about 11,000 votes in the state.

Earlier, Giuliani opened by saying that socialist-leaning politicians and officials have gradually eroded the personal liberties of Americans, noting that the allegedly fraudulent election process on Nov. 3 was an extension of that.

“We have been warned for 20 years that going to major mail-in ballots … will be fraught with tremendous fraud,” he said. “We were warned by former President Jimmy Carter,” former Supreme Court Justice David Souter, and prominent Democrats to “never do it.”

“Democrats used to be against mail-in ballots,” he said, adding that the current crop of politicians has reversed that viewpoint to gain more “money and power.”

In Arizona, much of the state’s alleged fraud had to do with the mail-in ballot system, Giuliani said.

“Once the ballot is separated from the envelope, it’s gone forever,” he said.

In Pima and Maricopa counties, there are hundreds of thousands of votes that should be “declared null and void,” the former mayor alleged. There was “clear fraud” in which poll workers were observed changing votes in Arizona, he said, remarking that ballot box stuffing also occurred.

Jack Phillips, Zachary Stieber, and Simon Veazey contributed to this report. 

Lawyers for President Donald Trump and members of the Arizona Legislature hold a public hearing on election integrity in Phoenix on Nov. 30, 2020. (Mei Lee/The Epoch Times)

Follow Bowen on Twitter: @BowenXiao

Republished with Permission The Epoch Times    SUBSCRIBE

Get Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

4 4 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Susan Anthony
Susan Anthony
1 month ago

Now we need to support and urge state legislators in states with the 74 more electoral votes needed, to enact the National Popular Vote bill for the future.

Most Americans think it is wrong that the candidate with the most national popular votes can lose a presidential election.
We don’t allow this in any other election in our representative republic.
The bill is 73% of the way to guaranteeing the majority of Electoral College votes and the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country.
The bill changes state statewide winner-take-all laws (not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, but later enacted by 48 states), without changing anything in the Constitution, using the built-in method that the Constitution provides for states to make changes.
It requires enacting states with 270 electoral votes to award their electoral votes to the winner of the most national popular votes.
All votes would be valued equally in presidential elections, no matter where voters live.

Martha Garcia
Martha Garcia
1 month ago
Reply to  Susan Anthony

by utilizing a majority vote system we will no longer be a democratic republic. In short, we use the electoral college system in order to allow every state to have a voice. If we counted only the majority vote then the only states that would matter would be California, New York, Texas, and Florida due to their populations.

We are not a true democracy. We are a democratic republic–look at our pledge of allegiance “to the republic for which it stands”– We are citizens of our States that are independent governments, with a national government to unite each state as a republic. Hence why we are called the UNITED STATES of AMERICA and not America. Every state must be allowed a say in how the federal government is run. We the people choose our state legislators as a democracy and then we tell the legislators how we would like our state to vote. We do not chose the president on an individual basis.

Michael A.
Michael A.
1 month ago

There was nothing ‘fair and square’ about this election. The only way now to satisfy all parties is to redo the election in the disputed states using one ballot for one voter, paper, no Dominion involvement, in person voting, no last minute registrations. Otherwise clever faudsters get away with stealing an election. Dems, you brought this upon yourselves.

1 month ago

How hard is it to accept – he lost fair and square. It’s time to let it.

1 month ago

What a shame our country has to go through this embarrassment thanks to a con man and a nut job with dye running down his face! Putin is laughing and laughing you fools!

frances markey
frances markey
1 month ago
Reply to  Lilly

Putin is not laughing don’t talk shite Putin is a christian and he will support another christian country. It is no embarrassment i am from Scotland and I know Trump is making America great again having lived in the country in the past and seeing the down turn under the democrats.