Beaumont City Council To Consider Opting-Out of SB54!

Beaumont, CA – The Beaumont City Council is to consider Opting-Out of SB54, the California Sanctuary State Bill at the April 17, 2018 meeting. 

If passed, the city of Beaumont will be the first in Riverside County.  This protest movement, already gaining ground in 9 cities in Orange and San Diego Counties so far, declares this bill as unlawful and against the Supremacy clause and violates Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

At the request of the Banning Beaumont Cherry Valley Tea Party, the Beaumont City Council is placing this issue on their agenda.  Tea Party President Glenn Stull, along with other Tea Party members, Michael Rossiter, Russell Roof, Sharon Hamilton, John Smith, Jeane Rossiter and John Turner, voiced their disapproval of this bill as part of their public voice at the April 3, 2018 City Council Meeting. The members stated, in their own words, that this unconstitutional law passed by the Democrat majority in Sacramento, is a direct violation of the Supremacy Clause and violates Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, “which prohibits States from establishing laws contrary to laws of the United States made in pursuance of the United States Constitution.”

They presented an ordinance to the Council, written by Constitutional expert Douglas V. Gibbs, as part of their request for a resolution and ordinance to be passed by the Council. The Beaumont City Council agreed to bring this agenda matter up at the next meeting, which is scheduled for April 17, 2018.

The Constitution states:  “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”   “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution.”

Get Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *