Monday, March 18, 2024
60.5 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    Two Visions of America by Don Jans

    California Is Spending The 7th Most On Housing & Community Development Per Capita

    The COVID-19 pandemic has placed many stresses on low- and middle-income families, and one of the most noteworthy is housing affordability.

    Supply chain breakdowns have slowed new housing construction, the market for homebuyers is one of the most competitive in memory, and rents nationwide have increased by 13.8% since January 2021. Even as these trends continue to worsen, federal COVID-19 emergency relief measures have expired, including income supports like expanded unemployment benefits and housing policies like mortgage forbearance and the federal eviction moratorium.

    While the pandemic has exacerbated housing issues, the affordable housing crisis is not a new problem. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the U.S. has a shortage of nearly 7 million affordable homes, while 70% of low-income families are severely cost-burdened by housing, which means that they spend more than half of their income on rent.

    Over the years, federal, state, and local governments have carved out an important role in addressing these challenges through public investments in housing and community development. Generally allocated towards residents not adequately served by the private sector, government housing and community development expenditures include the construction and operation of housing projects, along with other activities to promote or aid housing and community development. These other activities can include public housing, rental assistance like the Section 8 program, and community development or revitalization projects. Many of these programs are distributed from the federal government as grants for state and local governments to spend.

    Housing and community development is a relatively small spending category for most state and local budgets, but spending in this area has consistently grown at a faster rate than spending overall. Inflation-adjusted expenditures for housing and community development are up nearly 300% since 1977, even after accounting for an uptick in spending during the early 2000s and an eventual post-Great Recession reduction beginning in 2011. Total spending has only increased by 190% during the same period.

    One factor that is likely to contribute to continued growth in the next few years is federal COVID-19 relief dollars targeted toward housing and community development. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act from March 2020, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act from December 2020, and the American Rescue Plan Act from March 2021 all distributed funds to states and localities to help ensure people would be able to maintain access to housing during the pandemic and ensuing recession. This means that future data will show higher expenditures for housing and community development in 2020 and 2021. And with aggressive proposals to support low and middle-income families being a key part of the Biden Administration’s agenda, states could continue to see increased federal investment in this area into the future.

    States vary significantly in how much they spend to support housing and community development. Massachusetts leads the nation in both housing and community development spending per capita at $432, and in spending per low-income resident (defined as those with incomes below 200% of poverty level) at $2,144. Most of the other leading states are located in the Northeast or on the West Coast. One reason why these states may be investing more in housing and community development is that housing in these locations tends to be less affordable, which means that government support is necessary to help increase the supply of housing and provide assistance so that lower-income residents can access it.

    The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances report and the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates report. To determine the states spending most on housing and community development, researchers at HireAHelper calculated state and local housing and community development spending per capita. In the event of a tie, the state with the greater amount of housing and community development spending per low-income resident was ranked higher. Researchers also included total annual housing and community development spending, as well as its share of total state and local government spending.

    The analysis found that overall, California is spending $226 per resident on housing and community development. Out of all states, California is spending the 7th most on housing and community development per capita. Here is a summary of the data for California:

    • Housing & community dev. spending per capita: $226
    • Housing & community dev. spending per low-income resident: $820
    • Total annual housing & community dev. spending: $8,889,557,000
    • Housing & community dev. spending share of total spending: 1.40%

    For reference, here are the statistics for the entire United States:

    • Housing & community dev. spending per capita: $172
    • Housing & community dev. spending per low-income resident: $610
    • Total annual housing & community dev. spending: $56,554,053,000
    • Housing & community dev. spending share of total spending: 1.43%

    For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on HireAHelper’s website: https://www.hireahelper.com/lifestyle/states-spending-the-most-on-affordable-housing/

    Mike LaFirenza writes for Lattice News Wire


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -
    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x