Tuesday, July 5, 2022
74.7 F

    Latest Posts

    United States Socialist Republic book by HG Goerner

    Coastal Commission to Address Short Term Rental Regulations July 10

    Sponsored - Job Posting

    We are a small but mighty business in Ventura, CA specializing in Civil/Agricultural Engineering and Land Surveying. Going strong for over 35 years. Looking for motivated team players for immediate hire. Candidates must have at least 3 years of experience in Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and AutoCAD Civil 3D. Must want to grow with the company. For the right person, management potential. Wages will depend on experience. Benefits include paid holidays, matching retirement plan & much more. Send resumes to: [email protected]

    YCE, Inc. is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Tel: 805-650-6995www.YCEinc.com

    The longstanding disputes on short term rentals in Oxnard will be taken up by the Coastal Commission at its July 10 meeting, when it will rule on whether Oxnard’s new regulations governing rentals will be approved. The meeting starts at 9 am. You can watch online and/or comment:

    Virtual Hearing Procedures

    Submit Speaker Request Here

    https://www.coastal.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/#/2020/7  (Click July 10 meeting tab)


    13. Local Coastal Programs (LCPs)


    1. City of Oxnard LCP Amendment No. LCP-4-OXN-20-0008-1 (Short Term Rentals).Public hearing and action on request by the City of Oxnard to amend its Implementation Plan to add regulations for short term rentals. (DC-V) Submit Comment



    The City of Oxnard is requesting an amendment to the Implementation Plan/Coastal
    Zoning Ordinance (IP/CZO) portion of its certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) to add
    regulations for short term rentals (STRs). Commission staff recommends that the
    Commission, after public hearing, reject the proposed City of Oxnard LCP Amendment
    No. LCP-4-OXN-20-0008-1 as submitted, and certify the proposed amendment only if
    modified pursuant to 3 suggested modifications. The modifications are necessary to
    ensure the proposed amendment to the IP/CZO conforms with, and is adequate to carry
    out, the policies of the City’s certified Land Use Plan (LUP). All of the suggested
    modifications were developed in cooperation with City staff. The motions and
    resolutions to accomplish this recommendation are found starting on page 6 of this staff
    Currently, the City’s certified LCP does not explicitly define, regulate or prohibit STRs.
    However, STRs have historically operated in the City for many decades, particularly in
    the residential neighborhoods nearest to beaches, and the City currently collects a
    transient occupancy tax (TOT) on some of the existing STRs whose owners choose to
    pay it on a self-reporting basis. Currently, without regulations in place, most STRs in
    Oxnard operate without a business license, without paying TOT, and without a permit.
    In recent years, with the advent of internet rental services such as Airbnb, HomeAway
    and VRBO, the short term rental of homes, condominiums, and apartments in Oxnard
    has substantially increased. The City has also observed an increase in the number of
    issues and complaints related to STRs in residential neighborhoods, such as noise,
    trash, and parking problems.
    The proposed amendment would allow STRs in all residential zones and would define
    “short term rentals” as the rental of a residential unit for a period of less than thirty (30)
    consecutive calendar days. The amendment also defines two types of short term
    rentals: vacation rentals and homeshares. A vacation rental is a type of STR in which
    the owner of the dwelling is not physically present for the rental period. A homeshare is
    LCP-4-OXN-20-0008-1 (Short Term Rentals)
    a type of STR in which the owner of the dwelling is physically present for the rental
    period. Both types of rentals would require property owners to obtain a short term rental
    permit from the City to operate, subject to the standards and requirements that are
    proposed in the subject amendment.
    The proposed amendment would also limit the number of vacation rentals to no more
    than 5% of eligible residential units in each of the four coastal zone neighborhoods
    within the City: Oxnard Dunes, Oxnard Shores, Channel Islands, and Hollywood by the
    Sea (Exhibits 1-2). The City estimates that there are approximately 5,000 existing
    residential units in the City’s coastal zone, and approximately 230 of those are currently
    STRs (which represents 4.6 percent of residential units in the coastal zone). The
    percentage of existing STRs in each of the four residential neighborhoods range from
    3.5 to 4.8 percent. However, within the Residential Beachfront (R-BF) zone of the
    Oxnard Shores neighborhood (Exhibit 3), there is a higher concentration of existing
    STRs – 17.2 percent.
    In addition to limiting the number of short term vacation rentals in each neighborhood,
    the proposed amendment would also limit vacation rentals within the R-BF zone of the
    Oxnard Shores neighborhood to five percent in order to break up the existing
    concentration of STRs within that zone so that STRs are more evenly distributed. The
    proposed amendment would also require that vacation rentals be separated from each
    other by 200 feet from property line to property line. Additional limitations on vacation
    rentals include a three-night minimum stay and that a dwelling may be used as a
    vacation rental for a maximum of 100 days per calendar year. The 5% neighborhood
    cap, 200 foot separation, and 100 day maximum per year requirements would only be
    applicable to vacation rentals. Homeshares would not be similarly limited.
    The proposed amendment also establishes a variety of regulations for STRs intended to
    limit neighborhood impacts from parties, noise, trash disposal, parking, and other
    related issues that are often raised in terms of STRs and community character. These
    proposed operational standards are generally similar to other standards the
    Commission has approved for adjacent communities, such as for Ventura County and
    the City of Carpinteria, as reasonable regulations to address potential STR issues.
    However, the proposed vacation rental STR cap and 200 ft. separation requirements
    are overly restrictive with regard to the R-BF zone portion of the Oxnard Shores
    neighborhood, and Commission staff does not believe the amendment strikes a
    reasonable balance between ensuring availability of short term rentals for coastal
    visitors and preserving neighborhood character and long-term housing for local
    residents. Additionally, in other neighborhoods, the separation requirements can serve
    to restrict the percentage of the vacation rentals allowed below the 5 percent cap.
    Although the City’s proposed 5 percent vacation rental cap for each of the four
    neighborhoods may theoretically allow a slight increase in STRs per neighborhood
    since the percentage of existing STRs in each neighborhood ranges from 3.5 to 4.8
    percent, the 200 foot separation requirement between STRs may prevent a
    neighborhood form hitting this cap. In some cases, imposition of the separation
    requirement would result in the amount of STRs below the proposed five percent cap,
    LCP-4-OXN-20-0008-1 (Short Term Rentals) even under ideal (for STR density purposes) spacing.

    Further, within the Residential
    Beachfront (R-BF) zone of the Oxnard Shores neighborhood, where there is a higher
    concentration of existing STRs (17.2 percent) among the 93 beachfront homes, the
    proposed restrictions would allow less than five vacation rentals STRs, leading to a
    significant reduction of STRs in the City’s only residential beachfront area that is the
    most desirable location for visitors.
    Thus, the amendment, as proposed, does not adequately protect STRs as a valuable
    visitor-serving accommodation (that can often be lower-cost than other
    accommodations) within the City’s coastal zone. Nor does it adequately protect public
    recreational and access opportunities (particularly in relation to the role that overnight
    accommodations play in providing such opportunities). The restrictions would result in
    reduced lodging options for the people who most need the economies of scale that
    STRs can offer to groups and families visiting the coast.
    In order to account for the relative desirability to visitors of some areas compared to
    others, while also avoiding significant adverse impacts to neighborhood character and
    housing stock, Commission staff is recommending modifications to the City’s proposed
    vacation rental cap and separation requirements. Specifically, staff recommends a
    modest increase of the vacation rental cap in the Residential Beachfront (R-BF) zone
    from 5% to 10% (Suggested Modification 1), and a reduction in the separation
    requirement within the R-BF zone from 200 feet to 100 feet. In addition, Commission
    staff is recommending another change to exempt existing STR properties from the
    neighborhood and R-BF zone vacation rental cap and separation requirement if the
    owner of an existing STR property previously paid transient occupancy taxes to the City
    and complies with the other requirements of the STR ordinance, including obtaining an
    STR permit in a timely manner and operating in compliance with the STR permit. The
    suggested modifications were developed in close coordination with City staff, and
    Commission staff believes these changes would not unduly restrict the rental of
    residences to visitors in a manner that will diminish the public’s ability to access and
    recreate on the coast, nor detract from the City’s goal to preserve neighborhood
    character. The amendment, as modified, also would preserve the availability of housing
    stock and long-term rentals and would not affect affordable housing.
    Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission approve the amendment with
    suggested modifications. If modified as suggested, the proposed amendment is
    consistent with and adequate to carry out the LUP.


    George Miller is Publisher/Co-Founder of CitizensJournal.us and a “retired” operations management consultant residing in Oxnard.

    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -
    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Notify of
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Latest Posts


    Don't Miss


    To receive the news in your inbox

    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x