CPUC eliminates “smart meter” opt-out fees

By George MillerCPUClogo

When “smart meters” were rolled out by utilities across the nation as part of the “smart grid” technology, there was much opposition. The “Smart Grid” was sold based on being able to monitor power usage much more closely, to identify trends, usage patterns, eventually implement time phased billing to encourage flattening of power demand and even control power input to the grid.

These so-called “smart meters” utilized to accomplish this can transmit usage electronically very frequently, allowing utilites to eliminate meter reading and get more real time usage info for planning and control purposes. However, there is a small, but very informed and energetic opposition to this all. Some groups mounted powerful legal opposition and were able to avoid installation of smart meters upon request. In most cases, a a significant initial and monthly fee was charged for this.

Specifically, objections fall into several categories:

– Not cost-effective

– Harmful RF (Radio Frequency) emissions

– Fire hazards

– Loss of privacy

– Loss of control (power companies would eventually be able to limit or even shut off power to a facility, or even a specific device, or class of devices, once “Energy Star” standards were adopted by device manufacturers and grid equipment.

We won’t comment on the validity of pro and con arguments in this article.

SmartMeterOptOut

“legacy” meter on opt-out plan. Photo: CitizensJournal.us

SmartMeterSCE

The CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) has been forced to drop the opt-out fees for customers (yes, utilities were charging customers NOT to receive this service, on the grounds that the manual meter readings are more expensive) on the paid opt-out plan for at least three years. The rationale for this appears to be more financial than anything, after battling over cost analyses for years. The ruling not only eliminates fees, but goes to bi-monthly meter readings to reduce data collection costs. 

This was actually decided last year, but just now being announced to customers and implemented.

 

 

Excerpts of the decision:

“In view of the utility overstatement of opt-out service revenue requirements in their initial proposals, we adopt a balancing account
(i.e., “recorded cost”) approach to setting the revenue requirement for opt-out service until each utility’s next general rate case (GRC).  In their initial fee proposals for opt-out service, utilities significantly overestimated the number of opt-out customers.  Since opt-out service costs are primarily based on the number of opt-out customers, the result was that utilities greatly overestimated the costs for opt-out service.  Using a balancing account treatment will protect ratepayers against a similar overestimation of uptake and revenue requirements…..

We limit the collection of the monthly charge from residential opt-out customers to three years from the date they choose to opt-out.  The remaining portion of revenue requirements that exceed the revenues collected from the
opt-out charges are to be allocated to the residential customer class as a whole.”

 

Utilities affected and amounts:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company $35.344 million
Southern California Edison Company $20.463 million
San Diego Gas & Electric Company $1.447 million
Southern California Gas Company $4.5 million

 

Here’s the actual CPUC decision- #14-12-078:

Title Doc Type Doc Links  
D1412078 Regarding SmartMeter Opt-Out Provisions.docxProceeding: A1103014; A1103015; A1107020 Final Decision PDF (979 KB)
WORD (132 KB)
____________________________________________________
George Miller is Publisher of Citizensjournal.us and a “retired” operations management consultant, active in civic affairs, living in Oxnard.
 Get free Citizensjournal.us BULLETINS. Please patronize our advertisers (including below) to keep us publishing and/or DONATE.
 Scroll down to post a comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jack

The CPUC didn’t eliminate “smart meter” opt-out fees.

The fees are the same, just only charge the monthly charge for three years.

Initial Fee Monthly Charge
$75.00 set up and $10.00/month for three years = $435

For CARE Customers*:$10.00 set up and $5.00/month for three years = $190

Customers with the opt out meter do not participate in the TOU (Time of use) billing program, resulting in overall lower bills than billing with the smart meter.

If you are a residential customer that uses a lot of power during peak times (12 p.m to 6 p.m.) you will save money with an opt out meter.

William "Bill" Hicks

GEORGE – With the recent revelation that your car can be hacked and held ransom, what efforts have been taken to avoid that with “smart” meters, if anything?

Ronald L. Lyons

Now that I have a solar energy system I can watch my savings grow. Maybe that is why the CPUC doesn’t need to charge for a refusal. They upped the rate on low-power users. That means my electric power bill will go up from $1.45 to $1.49 a month. Sweet.