Friday, April 19, 2024
57.2 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    Two Visions of America by Don Jans

    Federal Court Reverses Trump Rule Eliminating Protections For Gray Wolf Population

    daily caller oil prices rise petroleum reserve

    Thomas Catenacci

    • A federal district court restored protections for the U.S. gray wolf population on Thursday, ruling that a Trump administration action failed to consider threats posed to the species.
    • “The Court concludes the (FWS) failed to adequately consider the threats to wolves outside of the core populations in the Great Lakes and Northern Rocky Mountains in delisting the entire species,” Judge Jeffrey White, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, wrote in the decision.
    • In October 2020, the Department of the Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service announced that the gray wolf population had been successfully recovered and that it would be delisted from the Endangered Species Act.

    A federal district court restored protections for the U.S. gray wolf population on Thursday, ruling that a Trump administration action failed to consider threats posed to the species.

    Judge Jeffrey White, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, found that the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under the Trump administration ignored the “best available science” when formulating the rule. The agency improperly concluded that West Coast wolves were not distinct from the Northern Rocky Mountain wolf population, White said.

    “The Court concludes the (FWS) failed to adequately consider the threats to wolves outside of the core populations in the Great Lakes and Northern Rocky Mountains in delisting the entire species,” White wrote in the decision.

    In October 2020, the Department of the Interior and FWS announced that the gray wolf population had been successfully recovered and that it would be delisted from the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The science and data showed that the species was no longer threatened in the lower 48 states, a federal rule published in November 2020 stated.

    The rule was opposed by Democrats in the House and Senatescientists and businesses. While the Biden administration initially signaled that it would defend the Trump administration’s rule, saying the gray wolf population had “achieved recovery” in an August legal brief, it announced a 12-month status review of the wolf population in September.

    WATCH:

    “Today’s ruling is a significant victory for gray wolves and for all those who value nature and the public’s role in protecting these amazing creatures,” Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, said in a statement on Thursday.

    “Restoring federal protections means that these vitally important animals will receive the necessary support to recover and thrive in the years ahead,” she added.

    The Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club and other conservation groups filed a federal lawsuit in January 2021 challenging the delisting.

    However, organizations representing farmers and hunters have opposed the lawsuit and supported delisting the gray wolf from the ESA. The groups expressed concern at the ruling Thursday.

    “It’s disappointing that environmental activism carried more weight than science in this case. Rather than ruling on due process and adherence to recovery criterion, Judge White chose to remand the rule and undermine one of the most successful ESA recovery stories in United States history,” National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) Executive Director of Natural Resources and Public Lands Council (PLC) Executive Director Kaitlynn Glover said in a statement shared with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

    “This is just another attempt by activist groups to ignore the facts and rewrite the history of gray wolf recovery in the U.S,” she said.

    The NCBA and PLC led a coalition that included the American Farm Bureau Federation, American Sheep Industry Association and American Forest Resource Council that filed a brief in the case in May, opposing environmentalists’ efforts to have the gray wolf ESA protections reinstated. The groups argued that the protections had already done their job to protect the wolf population in the U.S. and that further protection would harm local ranchers.

    “In addition to the outright killing and maiming of calves, gray wolves have a stressing effect on my remaining cattle that reduces their economic viability,” Minnesota cattle producer Joe Wilebski said, supporting the coalition’s effort. “Waking up in the morning, I often wonder how many cattle are dead or missing due to gray wolf depredation. It has been a nightmare.”

    The National Shooting Sports Foundation, a group that defends firearm ownership and hunting, has also supported the delisting of wolves from the federal endangered list, saying such protections belong with state lawmakers.

    White was nominated to the bench by former President George W. Bush. He assumed senior status at the court in February 2021.


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -
    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x