Google’s fail and teacher jail: Firing one employee is big news, while not firing hundreds is ignored.

.
By Larry Sand
Without going through another weedy analysis of James Damore’s firing from Google – Holman Jenkins, George Leef and Nick Gillespie have done a fine job of that – let’s just say the Silicon Valley engineer was canned for stating what most scientists and sensible people have known ever since Adam and Eve frolicked in Eden – that there are biological differences between men and women and also for suggesting that the tech giant has become an “ideological echo chamber.” So the politically correct, party line zealots at Google decided, 1984-like, to shove the thought-criminal out the door.
That Google chose to fire Damore is pathetic, but did they have the right to do it? Do employers’ rights trump those of an employee? High-priced lawyers will collect barrels of money as they try to sort it all out, but I say that Google had every right to do so – no matter how wrong-headed and self-defeating it is. He was an at-will employee and, as such, had no “job protections.” Damore will be fine, however, even without a “wrongful termination” lawsuit. Job offers have already been rolling in for the young über-nerd and Harvard Ph.D.
In deep contrast, we have the “housed teacher” syndrome in many school districts across the country. Also known as “teacher jail” in Los Angeles, these holding pens are for public school teachers who have been accused of various misdeeds, like sexual abuse, violence, fraud, drug use, etc. Due to the teacher union contact, it is almost impossible to fire them. Instead the teachers typically report to a central location where they get to sit and stare at the ceiling for the length of the school day and then get to go home, all the while collecting their salary, maintaining full benefits and adding to their pensions. In 2016, this idiotic set-up cost taxpayers $15 million to house 181 “inmates” in Los Angeles alone.
One year later, the teacher jail population in Los Angeles is down 25 percent to 137. I guess this qualifies as good news, but the cost to the taxpayer is still $15 million. When a district spokeswoman was asked why the budgeted amounts were the same even though there are 44 fewer housed teachers, she only said “the budget has been $15 million for the last several years.” (Nothing like trying to get a thoughtful, coherent answer from a bureaucrat.)
And the bureaucracy is the problem. The school district really doesn’t give a rip about teacher jail and who and how many warm bodies inhabit them. The district superintendent, her underlings and all the other bureaucrats aren’t out a penny as various miscreants sit around and do nothing. The taxpayer has it covered. The housed teachers are fine; they never miss a paycheck and if they become ill, their health woes are promptly dealt with through their Cadillac health care plan, courtesy of the taxpayer. Most of all, the United Teachers of Los Angeles, despite its mock outrage at teacher jail – is fine with it. The union doesn’t miss a forced union dues payment, and in fact even profits as it get to collect dues from all the subs who are needed to replace their “jailed” brethren. (AB 215 in 2014 was supposed to improve things – streamlining this and expediting that, but there is scant evidence that anything has changed.)
In fact, the system is so rotten that, as pointed out during the Vergaratrial in 2014, less than 0.002 percent of California’s 300,000 teachers are dismissed for unprofessional conduct or unsatisfactory performance in any given year. This compares to the 8 percent of employees in the private sector dismissed annually for cause.
At the end of the day, Google will probably pay dearly – lawsuit, bad PR, etc. – for firing Mr. Damore. Most responsible people – left and right – thought the firing was wrong. Only the politically correct who mischaracterize what Damore said are fine with Google’s decision.
The outrage of Damore’s firing is justified, but please save some indignation for a system that virtually refuses to fire anybody, thereby abusing already overburdened California taxpayers year-in and year-out.
The mission of the California Policy Center is to secure a more prosperous future for all Californians.

Larry Sand, a former classroom teacher, is the president of the non-profit California Teachers Empowerment Network – a non-partisan, non-political group dedicated to providing teachers and the general public with reliable and balanced information about professional affiliations and positions on educational issues. The views presented here are strictly his own.











It’s not a matter of being impossible to fire a Teacher for cause, it’s having the will to do so.From the face of it, you would think that union contracts for teachers don’t have a counter to the union bosses, and frankly they don’t.
Consider that most School Board Members are former teachers. Board Members are who the union bosses craft out union agreements with. Former teachers are less likely to consider what’s best for students/parents needs, and side with every request from union bosses. Maybe the answer is to vote for Board Members that are NOT former teachers. And we all know that Board Members accept funds and other supports for their elections from Teachers Unions, in many, if not all, cases. Lets break up this relationship between Teachers Unions and School Board Members and see how education might improve by thinning out the teachers that have outlived their useful purpose.
The only people who overall are the winners in unions are the attorneys. I was the first woman in local 831 way back in the 70’s. I had enough intelligence to realize my great fortune at being hired for a job I cherished painting billboards for one of largest companies in Southern California. The union structure was benificial for training but I soon saw some amazingly stupid behavior. Like the absorbing of a defunct union to grandfather in an individual who did nothing but paint boards white. He was paid more than many extremely talented artists based on years of service in his former union. When computer technology began advancing in the 80’s the union members were offended by my interest in bringing in technology at the base of our process. Not the painting but the pattern making.
Heels were ground in and raises were expected year after year. Then the union absorbed the window deocorators… this Semmes od as they had many members but we’re not connected in any way to our skills. By the early 90’s computers could produce a billboard for about $2.50 a sq ft… compared to hand paint at $14.00 a sq ft. Guess who was left in the union jobs… the window decorators and the attorney. Guess who made the most money?
We have lost our sense of reason in hanging on to processes developed to protect against greed and abuse and have homogenized our thinking into robotic political rhetoric missing the point altogether. And it is costing a fortune every day.