How does the FBI review 650,000 emails in only 8 days?
By George Miller
Yes, how DOES the FBI review 650,000 emails in only 8 days?
I don’t know. Many doubt that anyone does. Many, including Donald Trump don’t think that the FBI did. Can anyone explain how Comey’s FBI reviewed, digested and analyzed so many emails in a week and decided that there was no basis for charging Hillary Clinton? Comey wrote that they only searched for emails sent to or from Hillary Clinton.
It is absurd, really, further reduces credibility of the fabled agency and shows that it is just as subject to political influence as all other agencies in the Obama administration.
“You can’t review 650,000 new emails in eight days. You can’t do it, folks,” Trump said, adding, “Hillary Clinton is guilty. She knows it, the FBI knows it, the people know it, and now it’s up to the American people to deliver justice at the ballot box on November 8.” _ Donald J. Trump
It was said that about 650,000 emails were found on “Weiner’s” computer, one which he shared with Huma Abedin. Who is “Weiner?” That would be disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner, caught multiple times “sexting.” He then had the gall to run for NYC Mayor. Incidentally, he is the estranged husband of Huma Abedin. Who is Huma Abedin? She has been Hillary Clinton’s top aide for many years, with access to to highly classified information. Raised in Saudi Arabia and in a family of Muslim Brotherhood members, as well as associated with the blackmail-prone “Weiner,” it’s difficult to see how she could obtain a security clearance.
In any case, the latest eMailGate may merely be a distraction. There are at least 5 other Clinton FBI investigations underway and the NYPD may weigh in on this too. Then of course there are the thousands and thousands of WikiLeaks emails “dumped”, many incriminating, and the loads of stuff from Anonymous, Project Veritas, Judicial Watch and even the FBI, etc. All of these things have already been exposed. Enough to keep an honest agency busy for years.
In July, when Comey first declined to recommend prosecution of Clinton, he rattled off a long list of Hillary’s offenses , many of which are felonies, before inexplicably saying that no prosecutor would act on this. Amazing, but not unexpected.
None of this changes the facts that using private servers to conduct government business is highly illegal; deleting subpoenaed emails and lying about their content is highly illegal; using the office to sell favors and raise money for the Clinton “Foundation” is highly illegal; mishandling classified information is also highly illegal and in some cases, treasonous.
What is needed now is an active FBI member of importance or some other law enforcement agency to speak up.Not high-ranking, but former FBI agent Hugh Galyean will be on the Hannity radio show Monday or Tuesday. We’re sure that Hannity will ask him about all this in the unlikely event that he doesn’t volunteer it.
Meanwhile, it is left up to voters to seek out the information (which is not made readily available by the so-called “MainStream Media”) read, analyze and make up their own minds, then vote accordingly. Given all that is already available, the picture of Hillary Clinton is not a pretty one.
“We thought that Director Comey and the FBI were wrong when they made their initial recommendation in July, and we think that they’re wrong now,” Trump spokesman Jason Miller to Wolf Blitzer, CNN.
See
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/comey-lets-clinton-off-email-server/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-email-comey.html?_r=0
Flashback: http://nypost.com/2016/09/23/fresh-proof-the-fbis-hillary-email-probe-was-a-joke/
George Miller is Publisher of CitizensJournal.us and a “retired” operations management consultant residing in Oxnard
Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE
I’ve heard that the 650,000 e-mails were searched based on key words and were not individually read. That may explain how 650,000 e-mails were researched, but doesn’t explain why the 50-65,000 e-mails took over 6 month’s.
It’s “Common Core” math.