In Support of the Open Carry Society

By Thomas L. Knapp

“I don’t care if it’s constitutional or not at this point,” Cleveland police union president Stephen Loomis told CNN as Republicans gathered in his city for their 2016 national convention. “I want [Ohio governor John Kasich] to absolutely outlaw open-carry in Cuyahoga County until this RNC is over.”

Kasich, to his credit, demurred, responding “Ohio governors do not have the power to arbitrarily suspend federal and state constitutional rights or state laws as suggested.”

“Open carry” — that is, legal recognition of the right to carry a weapon without concealing it from view — is a hot topic this week, not only due to Loomis’s appeal for suspension of the US Constitution in Ohio, but in the aftermath of a July 17 gunfight in Baton Rouge, Louisiana in which three police officers and a former US Marine from Kansas City were killed.

The police version of the Baton Rouge incident is that 29-year-old Gavin Long “lured” police officers to his location where he “intentionally targeted and assassinated” them. Left unexplained is why several officers rushed to his location on the basis of a 911 call (not made by Long himself) reporting something perfectly legal  in 44 states, including Louisiana: A man carrying a gun.

Yes, perfectly legal. Only California, Florida, Illinois, New York, South Carolina, Texas and the District of Columbia prohibit the open carry of firearms. Some other states require a permit, but those schemes as well as the prohibitions are clearly unconstitutional.

Did Long “lure” police officers to their “assassinations” or did he respond to actions he perceived as an armed attack by police in a city on edge since the July 5 police killing of a black man, caught on camera? We may never know. But we can and should draw this lesson from Baton Rouge and from Cleveland:

For some reason, police seem to consider open carry of firearms, even where formally legal (the US Constitution says it’s legal everywhere in America, but that’s another column), to constitute prima facie evidence of criminal intent. It isn’t, and treating it as such can only lead to unnecessary violent outcomes.

More than 100 million Americans own more than 300 million guns.

An infinitesimal portion of those gun owners commit crimes using those guns, and that tiny criminal fraction would do so whether open carry (or concealed carry) was legal or not, because committing crimes is what criminals do.

It neither is nor should be the responsibility of millions of non-criminal gun-owning Americans to coddle and cater to hoplophobia (“a mental aberration consisting of an unreasoning terror of gadgetry, specifically, weapons”) on the part of their fellow citizens, or especially of their putative employees, the police.

Guns, and gun owners, are here to stay. Get used to us.

open.carry.gun

________________________________________________________

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

 *Scroll down to post a comment

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Thomas Knapp
Thomas Knapp
5 years ago

Bill,

“If this man was not intent on assassinating police then why were there so many police shot, injured and killed.”

Actually, that’s part of my reason for thinking that he may have been ambushed himself and have acted defensively: He was a Marine. Therefore, if he had gone out with the intention of killing cops, I assume he’d have killed more than three.

As far as you having a problem with open carry is concerned, well, if you have a problem with open carry then you have a problem. That problem, as I mentioned, has a name. It’s called hoplophobia. If you call the police to report a perfectly legal activity, they should ask you what your damage is and tell you to quit wasting their time. And if you use an emergency line to do it, they should consider prosecuting you for abuse of emergency communications.

William "Bill" Hicks
William "Bill" Hicks
5 years ago

You give cover for the obvious. If this man was not intent on assassinating police then why were there so many police shot, injured and killed.

My guess is that you might not have any problem with a man walking down your street with an openly carried weapon without having the slightest concern that he meant evil toward someone. I’m pro-gun for legal ownership and use. somehow I would have a problem seeing someone walking down my street with a rifle in his hands. I could be wrong in my assessment, but I believe that the police can ferret that out for me. That’s why I’d call the police as well. In the meantime, I’d lock and load in case the police might not be available to ferret out a bad guy.