Wednesday, October 5, 2022
64.1 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    The Road to Tyranny by Don Jans
    America on the Precipice Documentary

    Meet California’s “Red Flag” Law Evangelist

    By Ben Christopher

    It happens almost every time there’s a new mass shooting.

    After Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas and Parkland, Florida and Highland Park, Illinois the question comes up again and again: How can we stop these people from having guns in the first place?

    “Red flag” laws, which make it easier for authorities to remove firearms from those deemed to pose a threat to themselves or others, have become an increasingly common answer to that question.

    But even when states put these laws on the books, they’re often ignored by local law enforcement.

    California’s biggest exception: San Diego.

    CalMatters politics reporter Alexei Koseff spent some time with Deputy City Attorney Jeff Booker, who oversees San Diego’s gun violence restraining order unit, to learn how the city became a model for implementing a law that many California gun violence researchers point to as one of the state’s most vital.

    Since 2017, San Diego’s City Attorney’s office has successfully overseen the seizure of more than 1,600 firearms from 865 people. That’s turned Booker’s small unit into a go-to resource for agencies outside the city looking to do the same. More than 100 have called his office for advice since January alone.

    California has a long way to go.

    Even before the state introduced its current “red flag” law in 2016, the state created a database of “armed and prohibited persons” — people who legally purchased a firearm but were later legally disqualified from having one, often after committing a violent crime.

    As CalMatters has extensively reported, the state, which has among the toughest gun laws in the country, has a lousy track record of actually going out and getting those guns. The consequences of that failure can be fatal.

    Earlier this summer, Gov. Gavin Newsom launched an $11 million campaign to promote the use of gun violence restraining orders to law enforcement, domestic violence survivor support organizations and other community groups.

    On Friday, the administration dropped the latest from the campaign: In a message to the parents of school-aged children released on Friday, the Office of Emergency Services touted these red flag orders as “a tool that could prevent school shootings and gun suicides among youth, teens and families.”

    SOURCE


    TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT CITIZENS JOURNAL  Help keep us publishing –PLEASE DONATE

    - Advertisement -

    1 COMMENT

    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    1 Comment
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    C E Voigtsberger
    C E Voigtsberger
    14 days ago

    In the meantime, officials ignore people who post threats on line to shoot up schools while spending time tracking down 30 year old convictions for minor assault charges when the “criminal” was in his early 20s and had an indiscreet amount of alcohol.

    And, of course, all of this is done ex parte which means the raving, vicious, demented homeowner who hasn’t had so much as a traffic ticket in the intervening years doesn’t get a notice that the hearing is being held. The first he knows is when a couple of CA DOJ Schutzstaffen show up on his doorstep demanding his .22 rifle.
    Oh, yeah, he can spend a couple of grand or more getting a lawyer who specializes in gun confiscation cases to get his $175 .22 rifle back from the clutches of the sheriff. That is if the sheriff can find it in the exhibit room and it isn’t rusted shut so that it no longer is operable because it just happened to be stored under the dripping a/c unit.

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    1
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x