Most New COVID-19 Cases In California Are Occurring In The Most Vaccinated Counties


(Natural News) An analysis has found that California counties with above-average vaccination rates for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) also have higher than average daily case rates. The analysis also found that coronavirus cases are falling in counties with below-average vaccination rates.

Health authorities in California are attributing the rise in cases to the post-vaccine delta variant of the coronavirus. They believe this variant is spreading through the state’s unvaccinated population.

But the only conclusion that can be drawn from the analysis of COVID-19 vaccination rates and daily case rates in California is that the vaccines are not protecting the fully vaccinated, and these people are helping to spread the virus.

Some of the most vaccinated counties in California also have higher daily case rates

Local media organization Bay Area News Group analyzed the data and found that COVID-19 cases are rising in many urban counties that boast high vaccination rates.

Five counties, in particular, have both a higher percentage of fully vaccinated residents and a higher average daily case rate than the statewide average. These counties are San Francisco, Contra Costa, Alameda, San Diego and Los Angeles.

According to state data, four of the five counties are in the top 10 most vaccinated counties in the state. San Francisco ranks second in the county with 69.8 percent of people fully vaccinated, and an additional 6.5 percent have received one dose but have yet to receive a second.

For comparison, five counties have both a below-average vaccination rate and an average daily case rate that is under the statewide average and decreasing. These counties are Lassen, Modoc, Del Norte, Glenn, and San Benito.

Lassen County is the least vaccinated county in California. Only 19.3 percent of the population is fully vaccinated, and an additional 2.1 percent of the county has received one dose but has yet to receive a second.

So-called public health experts have attributed this disparity not to the fact that the vaccines spread the virus, but supposedly because the most vaccinated counties have high urban density. In these areas, experts have argued without evidence that the unvaccinated are passing the post-vaccine delta variant to the vaccinated.

New COVID-19 cases in Los Angeles County comprised of mostly vaccinated people

Los Angeles County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer announced on July 22 that at least 20 percent of the county’s new COVID-19 cases were in vaccinated individuals.

Ferrer has attributed the rise in COVID-19 cases in vaccinated people to the post-vaccine delta variant. “The delta variant is a game-changer,” she said. Data shows the delta variant is driving community spread, and the percentage of breakthrough cases in fully vaccinated individuals has also surged.

Like many other so-called public health experts, Ferrer has attributed the rise in breakthrough COVID-19 cases to density. (Related: VAX SCAM REVEALED: Los Angeles County brings back mask mandates, even for the vaccinated.)

She said the one main reason more vaccinated people are testing positive is that more people are vaccinated.

“The more people who are vaccinated, the more people who will end up testing positive,” said Ferrer.

Furthermore, Ferrer all but admitted that the COVID-19 vaccines are unable to fully protect people from the virus. She added:

“When there’s more community transmission it affects … even those who have protection. If you’ve got more people around you who are infected, the more likely you are to get infected… Those numbers will go up – including among vaccinated people until we get community transmission under control.”

Of California’s 58 counties, Los Angeles County is the 17th most vaccinated, with 53.5 percent of the eligible population being fully vaccinated. An additional 7.6 percent of the population has already received one dose but has yet to get the second dose.

Los Angeles County is also distinguishable for having administered the most doses out of any county in the state. As of press time, it has administered 11,184,380 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Learn more about how the COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective and are actually contributing to the spread of the virus by reading the latest articles at

Sources include:

Get Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

3.7 3 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D. Pringle

So you’re confident that we can send you over to another country to prove your words, and you’re good with that?
Your words….”If you’ve got more people around you who are infected, the more likely you are to get infected…”

You showed no valid Sources and San Francisco is NOT that vaccinated. Suggest that maybe you do some factual research.
Thank you

Mike Smith

Number of cases does not matter.

What matters is how many people have died of COVID-19 since the outbreak.

And frankly, with so much systemic reporting fraud over the last twelve months, no one will ever know.

Last edited 1 month ago by Mike Smith

What poll did you use to write this redicilous article! You don’t know what you are talking about. More Americans will DIE because this dangerous untrue article is full of lies and fear!
Stop with your fake news and start publishing articles to ENCOURAGE ALL AMERICANS to get the vaccine….So we can rid ourselves of this man made killer This virus has already mutated into a stronger and more highly contiguous virus and will mutate again to God know what if we don’t stop it. I know lots of people who had the vaccines and still got the Delta virus. Great news for us………all of them little to no systems. only had lite flu like symptoms that lasted only a few days..!!!!!
You must be a Democrat owned station who continue to undermined scientists and doctors who are trying to give us the facts as they develop!





William Hicks

BUT viruses do mutate; usually to less virulent forms that are less likely to cause death. This virus “variant” is true to form being more infectious but less deadly; at least to those vaccinated. Like the common cold, we will likely never be rid of this virus in whatever form it changes to. Maybe we should just get used to the idea that it is with us no matter what we do and get back to as close to normal life. IF you choose to live your life in fear, that’s your choice. I choose to live my life as carefree as I can.


Not only are there natural mutations, there are likely other time-release mutations built into the design of the virus. When are we going to stop glossing over the fact that the virus isn’t some unfortunate historical occurrence, but rather a bio-weapon built by the CCP to wreak harm on the rest of the world? And when are we going to hit back?

William Hicks


It could be, but I’d venture to say it is a guessing game we may never know the answer to. I know this, based on those that have escaped communist china, that there are no businesses or research labs that don’t have a military element
to them with the CCP.
The question now is……..Are We Going To Live Our Lives In Fear Of The Unknown?

William Hicks

OK, Where do you start with this article?

  1. Is it that those vaccinated actually may have antibodies against the virus, or is it that those vaccinated are super spreaders?
  2. Is there no benefit in the vaccine?
  3. Are the hospitalizations and deaths at a higher rate with the, so called, Variant?

Articles like this are as confusing as the CDC suggestions and the politicians behind them.This just adds to the confusion and I’ll trust my Doctor for my health concerns,

Michael A...

The idiocy of the Biden admin cannot be underestimated. Allowing hoards of illness carrying third world people into country, and then distributing by bus all over country is unabashedly idiotic. Besides that, it spreads new variants of the China virus willy-nilly.

William Hicks

YES MICHAEL……The more we have lockdowns the more likely the democrats will insist on ballots in the mail for all, and they will try to steal another election.

Michael A...

Exactly. It’s all about the steal.


I find this very difficult to believe.
With all the “evidence” from publications this is still hard to believe.
To me it comes off as more of the same “The Sky is Falling”

Tom Snyder

The government “experts” know nothing!


This is complete garbage. Comparing rates of vaccination to raw new infections is comparing apples to oranges. Suppose a less populated county has a low vaccination rate and a low number of cases. That doesn’t prove anything. You need to compare the per capita new cases to the vaccination rate.

James K.

That point is either beyond the comprehension of the non-journalist who wrote this, or it’s his deliberate attempt at misrepresentation.The piece is rife with distortions that a high school journalism class wouldn’t tolerate.

  1. “An analysis has found…” What analysis? Bu whom? When?
  2. Counties with the highest percentage of cases among the vaccinated are among the largest and most densely populated; those with the lowest rates the least on both counts.Lassen County cited here is 47th in population out of CA’s 59 counties, sparsely inhabited with limited opportunities of transmission. The question is not how many cases there are of illness among the vaccinated. The only solid epidemiological question is what the percentage of illness is relative to the number of vaccinated individuals. THAT is the relevant question.
  3. “But the only conclusion that can be drawn from the analysis…” Says who? Is Mr. Toledo an epidemiologist or a doctor? There are multiple other conclusions that could be drawn, and good journalism indicates that fact rather than present one possibility advanced here as valid by a non-professional in the field.
  4. The writer twice refers to “So-called public health experts” without any indication whatsoever as to why his obviously non-expert conclusions should be held in any regard at all, especially in contrast to trained professionals in the field.
  5. Simply listing publications as sources without specific citations to article and sections of articles is under no circumstances ever acceptable as sourcing in either responsible journalism or academia. A hyperlink to a flimsy anti-scientific anti-vaccination site also eviscerates this ridiculous and unsourced screed as a serious discussion of vaccination issues.

Ventura County deserves better than this.


“You need to compare the per capita new cases to the vaccination rate.”
No, that’s garbage because it does not account for the possibility of natural COVID survivors who have very strong natural immunity without a vaccine.

William Hicks

Has there been any consideration that these same counties have a high influx of the current south of the border invaders?


As pointed out, the counties with the least infections, are lower in population. But, if I remember correctly, of those five counties with higher rates, I believe four claimed themselves as “sanctuary cities” a while back…and one county is where you have three ports of entry. Perhaps, this has something to do with it?

Also, Barbara Ferrer (who’s a joke, besides looking like the mother of Beetlejuice), says something that a lot of people have missed: you will have more positive cases, because you’re now carrying some type of antigen or antibody, if you get tested again. This became apparent, when those who were in hospitals, or out-patient care, were required/requested to get follow up tests, every 3-7 days. Instead of this same person, remaining ONE person tested, all of his follow up tests, would be labeled a “new case”. A way to inflate numbers. Not to mention, all the false-positive tests. I had two of these; one at Ventura College(April 2020), one at the Fairgrounds(July 2020). I wasn’t sick, had no symptoms, just wanted to know if I had the anti-bodies, since I was ill with the “flu” in December of 2019. County Health harassed me for days, after both tests, trying to get me to check into the hospital, even though I insisted I wasn’t sick. A month later (August 2020) decided to have my doctor arrange a serum blood test, since I was taking a trip out of the country. Guess what I was informed a week later? Negative! You can get a false-positive, if you’ve had the normal, regular cold or flu in the last six months…maybe longer.

So, take the “new case numbers” with a grain of salt, and, with a raised eyebrow. What they’re NOT telling you, is:
1.) How many of these new cases, is the same returning person?
2.) How many that really need hospitalization, actually have comorbidity?
3.) How many have died, from Covid, only (w/o comorbidity)?

As what the CDC website said last week, there was 376 deaths from Covid…out of 330 million people in the US. If you know how to navigate their website, and, what to look for, these coming lockdowns and mask/vaccine mandates are not warranted.

William Hicks

Thanks Steve

Much of what you’ve said here is what many of us suspicioned. You just tied it up in a bow.
Again, thanks