Saturday, August 13, 2022
65 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    Two Visions of America by Don Jans

    No Charges Will Be Filed Related to Ventura Protest Incident – Driver acted in self-defense

    Sponsored - Job Posting

    We are a small but mighty business in Ventura, CA specializing in Civil/Agricultural Engineering and Land Surveying. Going strong for over 35 years. Looking for motivated team players for immediate hire. Candidates must have at least 3 years of experience in Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and AutoCAD Civil 3D. Must want to grow with the company. For the right person, management potential. Wages will depend on experience. Benefits include paid holidays, matching retirement plan & much more. Send resumes to: [email protected]

    YCE, Inc. is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Tel: 805-650-6995www.YCEinc.com

    VENTURA, California – District Attorney Gregory D. Totten announced today that no charges will be filed related to a protest and traffic incident that occurred in the afternoon on June 7, 2020.

    Numerous protesters had congregated at the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Telephone Road in the city of Ventura during a planned protest. During that time, protestors were occupying the sidewalk, two lanes of traffic on Victoria Avenue and the center median. Protesters were moving through the lanes of traffic in the roadway, obstructing motorists. Traffic continued to proceed through the intersection, and ultimately a low speed collision occurred between a white pick-up truck and two protestors standing in the roadway on northbound Victoria Avenue. Following the collision, the motorist and the two protesters involved contacted police to report the incident. A review of the witness statements and video footage of the events before, during, and after the collision established that there is insufficient evidence to prove criminal charges against the motorist, as he acted in legal self-defense and out of legal necessity.

    Video footage of the incident revealed the motorist was lawfully operating his pick-up on the roadway when he encountered protesters in the roadway, who were in violation of the California Vehicle Code. The motorist motioned with this hand for people to move away as he proceeded slowly and reasonably in his lane when protesters surrounded his pick-up while yelling and pounding on it. Other lanes were occupied by other vehicles as well, and those motorists proceeded at similar speeds, further establishing what reasonable motorist conduct was under the circumstances. As protesters pounded on his vehicle, the motorist and his passenger, who was pregnant, believed that the passenger compartment would be breached and they would be physically harmed. At that point, the motorist acted in reasonable fear for his and his passengers’ physical safety and proceeded forward. This caused one of the protesters who was already in physical contact with the front of the pick-up to be pushed down. This protester quickly rose to his feet and was one of several protesters who chased the pick-up. As the motorist drove forward, a second protester was struck in the foot as she moved out of the way. One of the protesters involved in the collision later reported suffering a fractured ankle. The other protester involved reported no injury. The motorist proceeded to leave the area as one protester struck the pick-up with a skateboard and several others chased the vehicle, placing the motorist in reasonable continued fear for his and his passengers’ safety. Once the motorist reached a safe location, he contacted the police to report his involvement in the incident. The pick-up sustained several dents and scratches consistent with the video footage of the protestors striking the vehicle. Based on these facts, there is insufficient evidence to establish that the collision was the result of an intentional assault. The investigation was conducted by the Ventura Police Department.

    Relevant videos analyzed during the course of the investigation may be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/user/venturacountyda


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -

    5 COMMENTS

    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    5 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    William Hicks
    William Hicks
    2 years ago

    The anarchists were lucky this time that there was little injury in this incident.

    A rhetorical Question:

    What if the passenger in the truck went into labor and there was an injury or death resulting? Who would be responsible?

    Mary Gallegos
    Mary Gallegos
    2 years ago

    Were the protesters charged with assault? Were they fined? Were they arrested? Why was only the driver investigated?

    The conclusion “was the result of an intentional assault”.
    What were the consequences to the protesters?

    This articles only addresses half the problem. its incomplete.

    William Hicks
    William Hicks
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Mary Gallegos

    Mary

    It was easy to identify the driver of the truck and his passenger. The question now is ……”who can you identify as the leader in this mob riot?”

    Brandi
    Brandi
    2 years ago

    Play stupid games win stupid prizes

    Citizen Reporter
    2 years ago

    Looks like a local assembly district 37 candidate had already noted the incident at the BLM protest:

    https://coleforassembly.us19.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c2a67f421f219d26c11abf7d8&id=155e7499c2&e=72eebe611a

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    5
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x