Oak Park Shuts Out Community and District-of-Choice Families

By Pat Lynch

Oak Park Unified School District chose to shut out the community, but the community showed up anyway. Oak Park Unified held a parent information night on Tuesday, September 10th in response to the controversy and backlash to the newly adopted gender identity curriculum. There’s a catch, though. Only parents of currently enrolled elementary students were allowed to attend, and they were required to RSVP in order to be admitted.

Taxpayers and residents of Oak Park, who are funding the district, were NOT welcome. Parents of children in middle school or high school were NOT welcome. Parents considering Oak Park as a District of Choice and applying soon were NOT welcome to find out what the school will be teaching their children.

Gender Identity Books at Oak Park. “Neither” is about an animal that is halfway between bird and bunny. “Red” is the story of a crayon that is different on the inside.

While highly unorthodox and seemingly contrary to their “welcoming school” mantra, it is not illegal to close their meetings if school board members are not present in majority. Oak Park made sure that there were not enough board members there, so they didn’t have to allow the public in.

Parents, grandparents and community members showed up in droves to express their concerns about this controversial gender identity curriculum. Per State law, this curriculum is completely optional for grades K-6, so Oak Park is defying parents unnecessarily. Oak Park USD is also incorrectly claiming that no opt-out is possible. This is optional curriculum, so of course they can offer an opt-out. The State just does not mandate the offer of an opt-out.

Several local news crews were also present to document the outrage this community is feeling in response to the lack of tolerance and respect by the school district. However, no reporters were allowed on site or in the meeting. Even the students from the high school newspaper were asked to leave until the meeting was over.

Administrators flanked the entrance and asked anyone handing out flyers or holding signs to leave the campus, and several times requested the Sheriff present to have those people removed. Another panel of administrators checked names at the door to confirm that only parents who RSVP could enter the meeting.

The meeting began with Superintendent Tony Knight warning parents that any speaking out of turn, disruptive behavior, including applause could lead to being escorted out by the Sheriff, standing in wait, and charged with a misdemeanor offense. The meeting was led by Knight and Stew McGugan, director of student support and school safety for the district. Local social worker and sex therapist Todd Walker, who specializes in LGBTQ tweens and teens according to his website, was brought in to explain the justification for this curriculum, stating questionable statistics about the LGBTQ and transgender student populations. The cited statistics were from the 2015 National School Climate Survey done by GLSEN, an LGBTQ activist organization whose survey methods have been widely criticized as heavily biased and not statistically valid. It is also curious why he cited the 2015 survey rather than a more recent version.

The panel also included a summary presentation of the curriculum presented by chief author of the curriculum, Holly Baxter, school counselor from Red Oak Elementary. Other members of the panel included the school counselors from the other two elementary schools and Jay Greenlinger, director of curriculum for Oak Park.

Holly Baxter and Todd Walker

For the Q&A portion of the meeting, written questions were only allowed using QR code reader, so parents had to download and utilize that mechanism, and these questions were heavily moderated. No discussion or follow up verbal questions were allowed. After the meeting, several parents complained that they only answered “soft-ball” questions, and none of their difficult questions were addressed. When asked if teaching gender fluidity would cause confusion in children, Holly Baxter responded “Children are stubborn and they just don’t change based on exposing them to an idea.” Many families were seen walking out in frustration during the Q&A portion. But what seemed to truly upset many families was when Todd Walker was asked at what age a child may be diagnosed with gender dysphoria, “I’ve seen a child as early as 18 months old.” Children can barely form a complex sentence at that age, let alone express thoughts on an abstract concept like gender. My kids certainly didn’t know the difference between girls and boys at that age.

Many parents left this meeting feeling discouraged and disappointed that their voices went unheard, and stating they still plan to keep their children home the days this material is being taught. Several parents mentioned they are already looking at moving their children out of the school district.

 

Follow Pat on Twitter

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Citizens Journal.


Pat Lynch is a resident of Ventura County


Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

15 Responses to Oak Park Shuts Out Community and District-of-Choice Families

  1. Mr. Street September 18, 2019 at 12:38 pm

    Greer- you nailed it. So easy a school board member should be able to understand.

    Reply
  2. Layla September 16, 2019 at 1:02 pm

    I talked to people at this meeting and it seemed the majority were not happy with how this was presented and I was truly offended that they had a sheriff there! That’s not how you treat parents! Honestly, the presentation itself also did little to ease my concerns about the implications of teaching this to such young kids. I don’t like how they seem to take parents out of the equation here… I’m the one who is teaching my kids about this. I don’t agree with how the school wants to teach it. I still don’t want my kids in these classes and will keep them home. I’ll take the unexcused absence.

    Reply
  3. Oakparkstrong September 15, 2019 at 7:42 am

    Shame on @jolm and @citizenreporter. Whether these parents were in favor of the lessons or not they asked questions in confidence of being left anonymous. You should respect their privacy. What kind of unprofessional reporting is this? Showing up in droves and in backlash? If you truly knew the people of this community many of them actually support the agenda, and the ones that you speak of that “walked out” were not necessarily walking out in protest – perhaps they had to pick up their kids??? Where are you getting this information??? It seemed to me that there were only the select few that walked out and tried to make a scene. By the way, had the district not imposed an RSVP the meeting would have become a side-show circus in our community. They moved locations to the high school in order to accommodate the capacity of parents with kids actually in school….what is wrong with that? No matter what my stance is on the issue I thought the meeting was professionally handled. You should be ashamed for trying to stir up controversy.

    Reply
    • Citizen Reporter September 15, 2019 at 9:03 pm

      You’re looking through the wrong end of the telescope. This should have been a PUBLIC meeting. We did have someone on the inside, a resident. It is newsworthy when a government organization, which is accountable to the PEOPLE, pulls such shenanigans, to thwart TRANSPARENCY and the will of the PEOPLE- and the Brown Act. It was most arrogant and UNprofessional the way that they handled it and you don’t even seem to get that. I suggest that you study up on civics, if such stuff is even taught anymore.

      Reply
  4. Pingback: Public Schools or Public Screwels? Part 31 – patriotmongoose

  5. Cali Peters September 14, 2019 at 10:20 am

    Where are you getting this information? The only people that showed up angry are the 6 hateful bullies. They were also the ones that left early. They were so disrespectful. They are the exact reason our kids need this lesson. They are hateful humans. You have no right writing this article, you truly dont.

    Reply
    • Page September 14, 2019 at 10:39 am

      Thank you, so true

      Reply
  6. Cali Peters September 14, 2019 at 8:41 am

    Such a false report. Where were these “doves” of people you speak of? Truth.. it was the small group of bullies that put hate in our community. You should be ashamed of yourself. You people are the reason we have so much hate in the world.

    Reply
  7. Jolm September 12, 2019 at 11:24 pm

    Were you able to get the list of questions asked, and the email of each person who submitted a question? I have them.

    Reply
  8. Lawrie Sikkema September 12, 2019 at 2:52 pm

    Parents need to wake up and REMOVE their precious children from these indoctrination centers! Place them in a private and/or church school, or homeschool. http://www.exodusmandate.org

    Reply
  9. Michael Greer September 12, 2019 at 12:04 pm

    This is presented as “anti-bullying” however, it isn’t necessary to teach about the LBGTQ lifestyles to teach kids not to bully. All you need to do is teach children not to bully kids different from them.

    This is NOT about bullying. It is NOT age appropriate. It isn’t even biology or science. It is lifestyles and techniques. It undermines family values and morality.

    Reply
  10. Mike Dunn September 12, 2019 at 6:26 am

    Fire Tony Knight and vote out the incumbents. Its the STATE indoctrinating the children. Just like Germany in the 1930’s.
    We pay for the public schools and we cannot attend the meeting…………the height of arrogance.

    Reply
    • Page September 14, 2019 at 10:41 am

      Maybe you should be more concerned with CVUSD problems

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *