Wednesday, August 10, 2022
70.4 F

    Latest Posts

    Two Visions of America by Don Jans

    Property Taxes Are 13.6% Of California’s Tax Revenue, Below U.S. Average

    Sponsored - Job Posting

    We are a small but mighty business in Ventura, CA specializing in Civil/Agricultural Engineering and Land Surveying. Going strong for over 35 years. Looking for motivated team players for immediate hire. Candidates must have at least 3 years of experience in Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and AutoCAD Civil 3D. Must want to grow with the company. For the right person, management potential. Wages will depend on experience. Benefits include paid holidays, matching retirement plan & much more. Send resumes to: [email protected]

    YCE, Inc. is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Tel:

    By Mike LaFirenza

    Despite many economic experts’ worst fears early in the COVID-19 pandemic, state and local government budgets have proven resilient over the last two years. With much of the economy shut down or hobbled as a result of the pandemic, forecasters initially worried that states and localities would collect substantially lower amounts of sales and income tax and face major budget shortfalls as a result. But behind falling unemployment, rising wages, and strong consumer spending, income and sales taxes have produced stronger-than-expected revenues since the initial shock of the pandemic.

    One factor that has helped protect state and especially local revenues over this period is property taxes, which are taxes levied on real property like land and buildings or certain forms of personal property. Property taxes tend to be more stable over time because property values are less susceptible to economic volatility than income and sales tax. Depending on when taxes are assessed, it could take years for any significant changes in property values to become apparent in a government’s tax collections. This certainly helped keep property tax revenues steady during the pandemic—and for some communities, collections could potentially grow in coming years due to the skyrocketing values of residential real estate.



    Property taxes’ stability could help continue to protect state and local budgets if the U.S. is headed toward a recession in the near future. Property tax collections represent 16.6% of state and local general tax revenues, which makes it the largest form of “own-source” revenue generated by states and localities, ahead of individual income (12.9%) and general sales taxes (12.5%). And among all revenue sources, property tax trails only intergovernmental funds (22%), which comprises funds transferred from one government to another (most frequently federal to state or local) through grants, loans, and other agreements.

    However, the overall mix of state and local revenue sources looks different across the U.S. Each state and local government offers a unique collection of revenue sources that weights income, sales, property, and other taxes differently. For example, nine states have no state income tax, while five have no state sales tax. Others have caps on property tax rates or restrictions around how property valuations are conducted that limit the amount of revenue from property taxes. This means that individuals’ specific tax burdens will look different depending on what state and local tax laws are in place where they live.



    Property tax collections across the states show these differences in action. At the low end, only 6.9% of general tax revenue collected in Alabama comes from property tax, while at the high end, property tax is 36.5% of general tax revenue in New Hampshire. New Hampshire stands out in part because the state has neither an income nor a sales tax, so many services are funded at the local level through property taxes. Many of the other locations highly dependent on property taxes are nearby Northeastern states including New Jersey, Maine, and Connecticut.

    The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. To determine the states that collect the most property tax revenue, researchers at Porch calculated property tax revenue as a share of total general tax revenue. In the event of a tie, the state with the greater annual property tax revenue per capita was ranked higher.

    The analysis found that 13.6% of the general tax revenue collected in California comes from property taxes. Here is a summary of the data for California:

    • Property tax as a share of total general tax revenue: 13.6%
    • Annual property tax revenue (per capita): $1,840
    • Annual property tax revenue (total): $72,711,695,000
    • Annual general tax revenue (total): $533,193,967,000

    For reference, here are the statistics for the entire United States:

    • Property tax as a share of total general tax revenue: 16.6%
    • Annual property tax revenue (per capita): $1,758
    • Annual property tax revenue (total): $577,007,937,000
    • Annual general tax revenue (total): $3,468,043,700,000

    For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on Porch’s website:



    - Advertisement -


    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Notify of
    1 Comment
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    C E Voigtsbergeer
    C E Voigtsbergeer
    30 days ago

    The percentage might be lower but the per capita take is high and the overall take is significantly higher due in large part to the overheated California real estate market. The figures make those whiney politicians and bureaucrats moaning about the adverse impact of Prop 13 property tax protection like so many other “leaders,” just full of it. Were it not for Prop 13, I could not afford to live in Kallyforniya. I would be forced to move after 50 some years here to some low tax state. While some may consider that good riddance as I have heard about corporations moving their operations to other states, enough of us moving out has several adverse effects other than getting rid of contrary opinion. We have seen it with the drop in representation in Washington for the Los Angeles area and California.

    When I move, I take my purchasing power to another area with the resultant loss in sales tax and work for the people who supply my needs. Enough people moving can most assuredly impact the economic growth required for the every increasing free spending of bureaucrats and pols. That results in even higher taxes and more people moving. Pretty soon there is a whirlpool effect dragging down the whole economy of the state as more and more people vote with their feet.

    Oh, but it can’t happen in Kallyforniya. I guess that’s what the pols in Michigan and other rust belt states thought too.

    Latest Posts


    Don't Miss


    To receive the news in your inbox

    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x