The classic saying in real estate is “Location, Location, Location.” Everyone who buys a home knows that where homes are located—by market, by neighborhood, and even by block—can cause wide variation in what they will list and ultimately sell for.
Changes in the real estate market during the COVID-19 pandemic have shifted some of the calculus when it comes to choosing both the location and the particular home. On the one hand, low interest rates have increased the amount of money buyers are willing to spend, as evidenced in part by the ratio of contractor-built to owner-built housing starts. When interest rates are high, many potential buyers opt to build their own home as a way to save money, pushing the ratio down. Conversely, when interest rates are low, buyers are more willing to pay a premium on a home that someone else built, and the ratio rises.
 |
Alongside lower mortgage rates and the corresponding increase in what buyers are willing to spend, COVID-19 has ushered in a resurgence of interest in large homes. With more people transitioning to virtual work and schooling, many previously high-demand markets have cooled off, while lower-cost markets offering larger houses and more “bang-for-the-buck” have new appeal.
To find the real estate markets where buyers can get the most for their money, researchers at Porch analyzed data from Zillow, Realtor.com, and the U.S. Census Bureau. They created a composite score based on five key metrics related to price, affordability, home size, and the recent and projected change in value.
At the state level, Kansas leads the nation by a large margin, followed by a number of other lower-cost states in the South and Midwest. Notably absent from the top of the list are coastal states like California and Massachusetts, where price per square foot and home payments as a share of income are much higher than in the rest of the country.
 |
At the metro level, it is unsurprising to find that many of the best bang-for-the-buck markets are located in the same states that rate highly for value. Oft-overlooked large metros like Indianapolis, Kansas City, and Cleveland top the list, a function of low housing costs both on a per square foot basis and as a share of income.
The analysis found that California has the 2nd worst “bang-for-the-buck” real estate market out of all 40 states with complete data available. Here is a summary of the data for California:
- Composite score: 59.0
- Median list price: $662,993
- Price per square foot: $368.15
- Monthly mortgage payment as a percentage of household income: 36.2%
- Median home size (square feet): 1,851
- Previous 1-year change in home price: +16.8%
- Projected 1-year change in home price: N/A
For reference, here are the statistics for the entire United States:
- Composite score: N/A
- Median list price: $334,043
- Price per square foot: $154.73
- Monthly mortgage payment as a percentage of household income: 22.4%
- Median home size (square feet): 1,838
- Previous 1-year change in home price: +7.2%
- Projected 1-year change in home price: +11.4%
For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on Porch’s website: https://porch.com/advice/the-best-bang-for-the-buck-real-estate-markets
Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE
