The Los Angeles Times Versus Larry Elder

By Roger L. Simon | Excerpt from Epoch Times

The other day I did something I thought I would never do again—subscribe to the  Los Angeles Times.

Although the paper had been kind to me in its book review section (now extinct) over the years, I left the city and state over three years ago and continuing to read yet another rote, liberal newspaper, indeed one that was failing badly—the LAT lost $50 million in 2020 and has been on and off the block for the better part of a decade—had little appeal.

But I am going back to California shortly to cover the gubernatorial recall election for this outlet and I thought the better part of valor would be to see what the state’s biggest newspaper had to say.

(It helped that they were running an online special—$4 for 4 months—hard to resist).

What I found did not altogether surprise.  The paper had devolved from a semi-national standard form liberal publication into something approximating an online anti-Larry Elder blog, so bent are they on the electoral failure of the talk radio show host in the coming recall election. By the way, in case you didn’t know, Elder is a contributor to Epoch TV.

But the degree it had taken to this mission did surprise a bit.  At its most extreme it put me in mind of Dante’s famous admonition at the gates of Inferno: “Lasciate ogni speranza voi ch’ entrate.”  Abandon hope all ye who enter… if Elder wins.

A quick search yields such recent LAT columns as “If Larry Elder is elected, life will get harder for Black and Latino Californians”.

This actually is the reverse of reality and inadvertently reveals the main reason, among many, for Elder’s candidacy, so I will get back to it shortly.

READ THE REST RIGHT HERE


PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT CITIZENS JOURNAL  Keep us publishing – Please DONATE

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments