By Thomas L. Knapp
In March of 1804, French dragoons secretly crossed the Rhine into the German Margraviate of Baden. Acting on orders from Napoleon himself, they kidnapped Louis Antoine de Bourbon, Duke of Enghien. After a hastily convened court-martial on charges of bearing arms against France, the duke was shot.
“C’est pire qu’un crime, c’est une faute,” a French official (supposedly, but probably not, Talleyrand) said of the duke’s execution: “It is worse than a crime, it is a mistake.”
That terse evaluation came immediately to mind when news broke of a January 3 US drone strike at Baghdad International Airport. Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ “Quds Force,” and nine others, died in the attack. US president Donald Trump claimed responsibility for ordering the strike and has subsequently defended that decision.
The duke’s execution outraged Europe’s aristocrats, and in particular brought Russia’s Alexander I to the conclusion that Napoleon’s power must be checked. The international reverberations created by Soleimani’s assassination are already shaping up in similar fashion.
Yes, Iran’s government is outraged and vows revenge, but that’s not surprising. It would be hard for US-Iran relations to get much worse short of all-out war.
Five of those killed in the strike were Iraqi military personnel from the country’s Popular Mobilization Forces, including their deputy commander, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.
Iraq’s outgoing prime minister denounced the strike as a violation of Iraqi sovereignty and  of the US/Iraq Status of Forces Agreement. The speaker of the country’s parliament vowed to “put an end to US presence” in Iraq. Powerful Shiite religious and political figure Muqtada al-Sadr, whose militia forces bedeviled the US occupation after the 2003 invasion, is re-mobilizing those forces to “defend Iraq.”
NATO, the Secretary General of the United Nations, and several leaders of regimes putatively allied with the United States have likewise responded negatively to Soleimani’s assassination.
Trump’s order wasn’t even remotely According to Hoyle under  under US law or the 400-year international order since the Peace of Westphalia.
The attack occurred without congressional approval or even notification, let alone the declaration of war that the ever-deteriorating US Constitution requires. Unfortunately, while Congress perpetually rumbles discontent over such things, it’s likely to continue enabling, rather than punish and rein in, such abuses of presidential power.
The attack occurred on the supposedly sovereign soil of a putative ally, killing that ally’s officials and invited guests. While it’s merely an escalation, not a new phenomenon — the previous president, Barack Obama, also claimed and exercised a “right” to murder on foreign soil at will — it’s a significant escalation by a president with fewer and less loyal friends on the global stage.
Whether Trump is “wagging the dog” in an attempt to distract from impeachment, or playing “6D chess” in an attempt to get the US out of Iraq at the demand of the Iraqis themselves (I’ve heard both claims), he’s turning friends against him and currying renewed European sympathy for Iran.
The prospects for peace on Earth have receded significantly since Christmas Day.
 Photo Credit Avens O’Brien
Thomas L. Knapp (Twitter: @thomaslknapp) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Citizens Journal.
Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE
Spot on response. I’m tired of reading garbage from clueless writers. especially those that try to compare situations few years ago. His argument is not valid
It’s called asymmetric warfare. You don’t have armies lined up facing each other firing off volleys of shot. You strike when and where you can that will hurt the enemy the most. We are engaged in warfare with Iran. Declarations of War died an unnatural death in WWII. Ever since then there have been no declarations of war formally issued by government heads. Not in Korea, not in Viet Nam, not in any of the hundreds of asymmetrical warfare scenes U.S forces have been involved in.
For instance, Kenya. What possible interest do we have in Kenya? Is it a major trading partner? Are there vast oil fields waiting to be exploited by U.S. oil companies? Are there recently discovered rare earth deposits? Then what in the world are our troops doing there? There are literally dozens of places that have the same strategic value of Kenya where our troops are involved in asymmetric war. If Congress declared war in Kenya, it certainly was not covered by the six o’clock news.
The Louis Antoine de Bourbon affair was over two centuries ago. It is hardly a current, valid comparison. Warfare in the 19th century was as different from current warfare as news broadcasting in 1804 is different from today. We have been striking leaders of forces waging war on us for decades now. This is just another leader who got his deserts.