<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Citizens Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.citizensjournal.us</provider_url><author_name>Debra Tash</author_name><author_url>https://www.citizensjournal.us/author/debra-tash/</author_url><title>SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement's Interests versus Society's | Citizens Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.citizensjournal.us/scotus-amply-serving-law-enforcements-interests-versus-societys/"&gt;SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement&#x2019;s Interests versus Society&#x2019;s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.citizensjournal.us/scotus-amply-serving-law-enforcements-interests-versus-societys/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement&#x2019;s Interests versus Society&#x2019;s&#x201D; &#x2014; Citizens Journal" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.citizensjournal.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/breathalyzer-tests-e1467073590603.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>500</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>335</thumbnail_height><description>By Thomas L. Knapp On June 23 the US Supreme Court ruled, in Birchfield v. North Dakota, that police officers may require suspected drunk drivers to take breathalyzer tests without warrants as required by the US Constitution&#x2019;s Fourth Amendment and under criminal penalty should they refuse. The court did go so far as to leave [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
