Thursday, February 22, 2024
58.9 F

    Latest Posts

    Setting Brushfires of Freedom by Don Jans

    Cotton Mouth: Political Careerist Vs. Ranked Choice Voting

    by Thomas L. Knapp

    US Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) doesn’t like ranked choice voting. It’s “a scam to rig elections,” he tweeted on August 31, after Democrat Mary Peltola defeated Republican Sarah Palin in a special election for US House in Alaska. “60% of Alaska voters voted for a Republican, but thanks to a convoluted process and ballot exhaustion — which disenfranchises voters — a Democrat ‘won.'”

    What he leaves out of that claim is that 60% of Alaska voters didn’t vote for “a” Republican. They split their first-choice votes between TWO Republicans, with Peltola getting more votes than either Palin or Nick Begich. Peltola was the second choice of enough voters to give her a majority in the “instant runoff” with Palin.

    If this had been a standard “first past the post” election in which a candidate could achieve victory with a mere plurality, Peltola would have won that way too: She received 39.57% of first-round votes to Palin’s 30.79% and Begich’s 28.09%. The ranked choice “instant runoff” merely confirmed that a majority of Alaska’s voters, rather than a mere plurality, preferred Peltola to Palin.

    Cotton’s sour grapes tweeting reflects his sense of party entitlement, not any opposition to “rigging elections.”

    In point of fact, Cotton’s campaign went to great lengths to “rig” the 2020 US Senate election in Arkansas, sitting on negative opposition research about sole Democratic candidate Josh Mahony until after the filing deadline so that he could hopefully coast to victory in a two-way race with Libertarian Ricky Dale Harrington.

    As it turned out, Cotton wasn’t able to clear 2/3 of the vote, even in a deep red state with only one under-funded third-party opponent whom he dared not debate or even acknowledge.

    That outcome may explain why Cotton fears and loathes the idea of voters ranking their candidate preferences and making those preferences count, instead of just heaving a sigh and ticking the box next to whatever supposedly lesser evil one of two parties presents for coronation.

    The “major” parties’ shared monopoly on ballot access, debate inclusion, gerrymandering, etc., combines with “first past the post” plurality elections to guarantee political careerists like Tom Cotton the paychecks and power to which they consider themselves as entitled as George III is to his newly acquired throne, crown, and scepter.

    Changes that better reflect voters’ priorities and make it more difficult for swamp creatures like Tom Cotton to cling to undeserved power are part of the solution, not part of the problem.



    - Advertisement -


    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Notify of

    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    George Miller
    1 year ago

    Hi Tom:

    In one respect, you make a good point, but consider this, too…. Conservatives had multiple choices to resolve, which mean that they split the vote, causing their defeat. The only way to avoid this under Alaska’s new system would be to get other candidates to drop out first, which takes choices away from voters. So, the party primary system has some merits. If it is operated correctly, it should also let 3rd and nth party candidates into the races.

    Guv. Hairdo
    Guv. Hairdo
    1 year ago

    Apparently Alaska voters are just as dumb as California voters. They fell for that Rank voting scam like Californian’s fall for the hairdo we call our “Governor”. SAD

    Sheryl Hamlin
    1 year ago
    Reply to  Guv. Hairdo

    The “top 2” primary exacerbated the partisan divide on CA.

    Latest Posts


    Don't Miss


    To receive the news in your inbox

    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x