Thursday, May 2, 2024
58.4 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    Two Visions of America by Don Jans

    Mass Media Hysteria Over ‘Dangerously Hot’ Summer Heat

    By Katy Grimes

    Long before ‘climate change hysteria,’ Sacramento had such hot summer days, we kids couldn’t walk barefoot on the sidewalks.

    Meteorologists forecasted June would be unseasonably hot. It wasn’t – we had lovely cool weather in June.

    Now that Summer has finally arrived in California, many of these shameless green agenda forecasters are warning of a “dangerously hot” summer.

    Yesterday this dangerously hot weather hit 94 degrees in Northern California after being told it would be 102. Today is is predicted to be 101 degrees. “Dangerously hot.”

    The Sacramento Bee, one of the climate hysterics, reports:

    “After two years of severe drought, record winter rains and now sweltering heat, more than four in ten Californians reported being personally affected by an extreme weather event in the last two years, a poll by the Public Policy Institute of California found. The survey released Thursday showed that nearly 80% of adults think climate change is contributing to extreme weather in the state and 82% consider the climate a top or near-top concern.”

    The PPIC poll was funded by the Arjay and Frances F. Miller Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the Windy Hill Fund. The Arjay and Frances F. Miller Foundation is not rated on Charity Navigator or Guidestar, despite an IRS ruling year of 1957. The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, created in 1964, supports environmental causes and population control programs, according to Influence Watch. The Windy Hill Fund is a total mystery.

    The hyperbole in the PPIC poll is ripe as they claim “Californians are facing ‘weather whiplash’ and heat waves as the global climate changes.”

    Despite historical polling responses finding that climate change is always far down on a list of concerns, the PPIC reports:

    When asked how much climate change is affecting their local community, 25 percent say “a great deal” and 46 percent report that is having “some” effect. Overwhelming majorities believe that climate change is a “very” or “somewhat” serious threat to California’s future economy and quality of life; however, partisans differ on these issues.

    Perhaps this mass hysteria is bolstered by Governor Gavin Newsom’s “extreme heat warning and ranking system.”

    Last September, Gov. Newsom signed a bill into law to create an extreme heat warning and ranking system in California. The Globe reported:

    Assembly Bill 2238, jointly authored by Assemblywoman Luz Rivas (D-North Hollywood) and Assemblyman Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella), will create a ranking and advance warning system in conjunction with the Department of Insurance and the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program (ICARP), a wing of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) that focuses on climate change impacts. Such a system will be developed by January 2024 and will also require ICARP to develop a public program around the ranking system and work with local and tribal governments in implementing the system locally, develop guidance in preparing and planning for extreme heat, and recommend adaptation measures.

    Pay particular attention to this: Newsom’s Department of Insurance and the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program (ICARP), a wing of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) that focuses on climate change impacts.

    And we wonder why our insurance rates are skyrocketing…

    California’s Missing-in-Action Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara opined:

    “California is once again leading the world in fighting climate change and its deadly effects. Ranking heat waves will be a powerful new tool to protect all Californians alongside Governor Gavin Newsom’s Extreme Heat Action Plan. I applaud the Governor’s and the bill’s joint authors’ continued leadership on these necessary extreme heat investments and policies that will save lives and close the protection gap for our most at-risk communities as we face more heat waves in the years ahead.”

    My weather app, which is far more accurate than most television meteorologists – and a lot less hyperbolic – reports that is will be 101 today.

    Oh NO!!!

    This “dangerously hot” day precipitated the Sacramento Zoo to announce it will close early today at 1:00pm.

    Last summer city officials imposed a soft lockdown on city residents: The parks were closed due to the forecasted heat wave. Parks are where people retreat when the weather is hot, to get out of hot homes and apartments.

    It was 106 degrees in Sacramento July 2nd. Today it could be 101 degrees. This is what is known as hot summer weather in California. We native Californians also know this is normal.

    As a kid, I remember such hot Sacramento summer days, I couldn’t walk barefoot on the sidewalks.

    But no one cautioned us to “be safe” or “stay hydrated.” In fact, back when I was a kid, parents told us to put shoes on and to stop being stupid.

    In July 1973, Sacramento’s hottest day was 107 degrees.

    Click here to read the full article in the California Globe


    TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT CITIZENS JOURNAL  Please keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -

    6 COMMENTS

    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    6 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Tom
    Tom
    9 months ago

    So the author cherry picks two days from her youth in Sacramento, compares it to two cherry picked days in Oxnard decades later and concludes the scientists who have literally been studying this for decades are wrong. And you believe it. No wonder the GOP billionaires seek out the most gullible people as their “base”

    Katy is a dunce
    Katy is a dunce
    9 months ago

    Nothing in this opinion piece refutes the science. Just another a$hole who wants to let her grandchildren deal with her stupidity. Nice attitude, bitch.

    Fuzzy Logic
    Fuzzy Logic
    9 months ago

    How long does a gnat live? 10 days? That’s the outlook of these climate spooks.

    Ray Blattel
    Ray Blattel
    9 months ago

    Rolling blackouts? How are EV owners supposed to charge their vehicles? I guess they better have invested in solar.

    FatmanScotty
    FatmanScotty
    9 months ago

    In another article on this page said (Economics, energy and cost)
    “This summer is expected to be cooler compared to summer 2022, which was above normal in almost all locations,” PG&E meteorologist Ted Schlaepfer said in the newsletter. “This summer may be the coolest since 2011 or 2012.”
    So which is it you can’t have it both ways.

    Last edited 9 months ago by FatmanScotty
    Sheryl Hamlin
    9 months ago

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    6
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x