Saturday, May 18, 2024
57.9 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    United States Socialist Republic book by HG Goerner

    POLITICS | Debate Grows Over How to Extend Unemployment Bonus

    BY EMEL AKAN

    WASHINGTON—The dispute over enhanced unemployment benefit grows as Republicans propose capping the benefits at 70 percent of a worker’s prior pay.

    Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on July 23 that the Republicans oppose extending the enhanced unemployment insurance in its current form.

    “Because we’re not going to pay people more money to stay at home than work,” he said.

    The CARES Act enacted in March provided a $600 weekly benefit on top of regular unemployment insurance benefits. Republicans and some economists argue that the current benefit is so generous that it might discourage workers from returning to work. The supplemental benefit under the Act will expire on July 31.

    “We want to make sure that the people that are out there that can’t find jobs do get a reasonable wage replacement,” Mnuchin said. “So it will be based on approximately 70 percent wage replacement.”

    During a joint press conference on July 23, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) rejected the potential Republican proposal, saying that it “falls very short.”

    “It appears the Republican legislative response to COVID is un-unified, unserious, unsatisfactory,” Schumer said.

    He also rejected the idea of reducing the extra unemployment benefit, saying “we like the proposal we have. It has kept millions out of poverty.”

    In May, House Democrats passed a $3 trillion relief legislation, the HEROES Act, which extends the $600 extra unemployment benefit through January.

    Pelosi dismissed the arguments that the extra benefit creates a disincentive to work.

    “The plural of anecdote is not data,” she said. “We need data.”

    “Why do they have to make a fuss over $600, which means a lot to many working families in our country, especially single moms in certain parts of the country where the unemployment benefit is very low.”

    Republicans say that the $600 benefit is creating a disincentive to find jobs since it allows many Americans to receive more money than they made before.

    As the disagreement grows over the stimulus bill, some Republicans have considered a short-term extension of the unemployment benefit while both parties negotiate a broader stimulus package.

    “This is a package. We cannot piecemeal this,” Pelosi responded.

    When asked if both sides can reach a deal by the end of next week, Schumer said: “I hope so. But they’re so divided.

    “Nancy and I sent a letter to McConnell three weeks ago saying let’s sit down and negotiate. Nothing. Now we’re up against the cliff. We’ve got to solve the whole thing because there are a lot of different cliffs.”

    Democrats and some economists believe that ending the $600 unemployment bonus would cause more financial harm on millions of Americans and further damage the economy.

    They emphasize the positive economic effects of the benefit, such as increasing consumer spending by injecting money into the economy.

    “By this warped logic we should start paying unemployed workers $6,000 a week and we will really have a rip-roaring recovery,” Stephen Moore, the president’s former economic adviser, wrote in a newsletter.

    “These benefits are not a life preserver but a job killer. Our studies find that these high benefits will mean 10 million fewer workers on the job by the end of the year, thus killing any chance of a V-shaped recovery.”

    According to Moore’s analysis, workers with salaries of up to $30 an hour make more than 100 percent of their prior wages by staying at home. And some part-time workers make more than triple from being unemployed.

    A study by University of Chicago economists showed that the additional benefit has provided income expansion rather than income replacement for most unemployed workers throughout the country.

    The study found that the estimated median replacement rate—the ratio of unemployment benefits to the worker’s original weekly salary—was 134 percent, and nearly 20 percent of unemployed workers were receiving benefits at least twice as large as their lost wage.

    Ernie Tedeschi, an economist at Evercore ISI, predicted that Mnuchin’s 70 percent wage replacement proposal could equate to a $188 weekly bonus for the median worker, according to CNBC. His analysis was based on the data from the University of Chicago’s study.

    The Treasury Department didn’t return an Epoch Times’ request for comment.

    Follow Emel on Twitter: @mlakan

    Republished with Permission The Epoch Times    SUBSCRIBE


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -

    4 COMMENTS

    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    4 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Rebecca
    Rebecca
    3 years ago

    I think it is crazy for people to expect more in unemployment than they were making prior to covid. How did you pay your bills before? Now you have become dependent on more money than you were making previously while some people aren’t making half what they were with the extra 600$. I think a percentage would be much more fair. If you are giving so many people three times what they made before unemployment then I should get three times what I was making as well!

    Timothy Scott
    Timothy Scott
    3 years ago

    If Congress thinks that the $600 a week unemployment benefits is keeping people from working they are wrong. Try living on $8.00 with a family of 6 without a job due to Covid 19. Why don’t they cut their salaries in Washington since they spend more time on recess than they do doing the people business in which we voted them for.

    Abbilyn cook
    Abbilyn cook
    3 years ago

    I’m unable to work because my child is 7 months old and childcare is closed down I’m a single mother with no help : without this extra 600$ we will go hungry loose our home loose our car . I won’t be able to provide for me and my daughter . I’m so scared of what’s going to happen

    Mary Ann
    Mary Ann
    3 years ago

    We Are Looking for Maybe A $400 Weeking Nit Totally Stop . Many Of Us Will Suffer . Paying Rent . Food To Eat . Praying At Extra $$$ Will Help Us . Mostly Low income like Us . Hoping That You All Think For the Better of Our Nation We All Be Safe Wear Facemask

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    4
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x