The Dark History Of Pfizer’s Paxlovid & What You Need To Know About Its Dangers

Suzanne Hamner

In the first of the three part series, Pfizer’s PAXLOVID May Prove Dangerous, Buyer Beware, a brief look was taken at the Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization letter, what PAXLOVID is, and some issues surrounding the regime. This will focus on the historical context of how PAXLOVID may have come into play.

In April of 2020, Nature published a study out of China titled, “Structure of M^pro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors”. The study appeared in June of 2020 at Pub Med. According to the study, the authors/scientists were looking at identifying drugs that could inhibit the main protease (M^pro) of the “virus”. It was concluded that six compounds could inhibit SARS-CoV-2 main protease that would slow/cease viral replication. The study admits it used a “combination of structure-based virtual and high throughput screening” of 10,000 compounds. Six were shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 main protease. One, ebselen, looked particularly promising. In December 2020, Pub Med published this study, “Ebselen, a new candidate therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2”. The key in both of these studies is the use of “in silico” and in vitro studies.

However, the December study found ebselen has anti-inflammatory properties, is capable of limiting liver injury induced by chemical and microbial stimuli, and has antiviral properties against other viruses such as influenza A, Zika, HIV-1, and Hepatitis C, making it a good candidate as a therapeutic for SARS-CoV-2. But, what was failed to be mentioned in the December study is the potential toxicity for ebselen, as indicated at PubChem.

In the study out of China published by Nature, several of the authors were associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. One author was associated with the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and one with the University of Queensland, Brisbane in Queensland, Australia.

If you recall, one supplement that demonstrated antioxidant effects because it is beneficial to restoring intracellular levels of glutathione is NAC 9N acetyl cysteine. From the website of Dr. Lee Merritt, “Decades of research has demonstrated the benefits of NAC 9N-acetyl Cysteine) in restoring intracellular levels of
one of the body’s most powerful antioxidant defenses, glutathione (GSH). As reviewed by Life Extension, NAC can protect against avian influenza and more common seasonal flu symptoms. NAC reduces the frequency and duration of attacks of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and may slow the clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). NAC protects tissues from the effects of exercise-induced oxidative stress, adding value and safety to your workout. NAC improves insulin sensitivity in people with some of the most difficult-to-treat metabolic disorders. NAC blocks cancer development at virtually every step in the process, and through multiple mechanisms, making it an important cancer chemopreventive agent. But we have learned that NAC is particularly beneficial in treating Covid—especially those people who have the variety with gastrointestinal symptoms.” In fact, Sally Fallon Morrell talked about raw milk as a good source of glutathione when on the Sons of Liberty Media Radio morning show with Tim Brown, along with Dr. Thomas Cowan.

In April of 2021, a study out of India, done in silico, examined 177 natural products as RdRP and main protease inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2. The study found that “Total four natural chemical entities with promising inhibition of RdRp along with twelve of these natural products inhibiting Mpro protein were identified …. The dual targeting inhibitors including dieckol, theaflavin-3,3′-digallate and phlorofucofuroeckol A were found to inhibit both RdRp and Mpro significantly. Additionally, rutin derived from Ruta graveolens, Tephrosia purpurea and Eucalyptus sp. and 7-phloroeckol derived from Ecklonia bicyclis have immense potential to inhibit Mpro with sufficiently higher stability, suggesting their candidature as promising SARS CoV-2 inhibitors.”

It appears studies were being conducted to find current therapeutics on the market as well as natural compounds that would inhibit SARS-CoV-2 M^pro and RdRP. This means these studies were looking for “off label” uses for currently available therapeutics to treat and prevent SARS-CoV-2. Yet, it has been Pfizer, with a new medication, nirmatrelvir, and protocol with existing ritonavir, along with its mRNA injection, that has received an EUA from the FDA. Moreover, the Zelenko protocol has been out for quite some time showing effectiveness against COVID-19. Likewise, America’s Frontline Doctors have a protocol for treatment as well, which has been shown effective. If you will recall, Dr. Lee Merritt, Dr. Bill Smith and Dr. Michael Roth, who have been guests on the Sons of Liberty Radio Morning Show with Tim Brown, are members of America’s Frontline Doctors. And, one cannot fail to mention that “Critically Thinking with Dr. T and Dr. P” (Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Dr. Lawrence Palevsky) have conveyed many natural products to combat COVID-19 as well as their episodes called “The Five Docs”, which includes Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Carrie Madej, and Dr. Lee Merritt. Dr. Andreas Kalcker, another guest on the morning Sons of Liberty Radio Show with Tim Brown, has had excellent results with Chlorine Dioxide for COVID-19. As always, tune to SoL radio every Saturday morning with Tim Brown and health and wellness expert Kate Shemirani to receive information that will be beneficial to aiding you toward health and measures that can stave off illness.

While the public was being told the only way to end the COVID-19 pandemic was through a “vaccine”, PubMed studies and other medical professionals indicate that this was not true and other sources also confirm a “vaccine” was not the only option.

Once again, the people have not been given all available information from those at the National Institute of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), or individuals like Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Deborah Birx, and the Operation Mockingbird media.

The next part of the series will cover PAXLOVID itself and what information Pfizer presented and omitted to its stakeholders. In the meantime, review in-depth all the sources provided, the websites for the doctors, and previous Sons of Liberty Radio Shows for information regarding alternatives such as Chlorine Dioxide and truthful COVID-19 information.

When it comes to EUA therapeutics, remember the buyer beware as none have been proven safe and effective.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Suzanne Hamner

Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE