Saturday, December 3, 2022
56.7 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    The Road to Tyranny by Don Jans

    Tobacco companies sue to block California’s flavored tobacco ban

    By Madison Hirneisen | The Center Square

    (The Center Square) – Days after California voters overwhelmingly approved the state’s flavored tobacco ban, a group of tobacco companies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the ban.

    California voters approved Proposition 31 this week, a measure that upholds a 2020 law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, Senate Bill 793, which banned the sale of most flavored tobacco products and flavor enhancers. Tobacco corporations swiftly filed a referendum after the bill was signed, and that referendum appeared alongside six other initiatives on this year’s ballot.

    The creator of Newport menthol cigarettes, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, and other tobacco corporations are seeking an injunction to stop the flavored tobacco ban from taking effect. According to the lawsuit, the ban will take effect five days after the Secretary of State certifies the results of the vote, which has to occur by Dec. 16.

    The tobacco companies claim the law is preempted by the Tobacco Control Act, which banned flavored cigarettes except for menthol. They also claim that the law is in violation of the commerce clause, saying California’s law “attempts to regulate manufacturers that are not within the state’s borders.”

    “California has no legitimate interest in enforcing its preempted and unconstitutional law,” the lawsuit filed on Wednesday states.

    Tobacco companies previously sued to challenge SB 793, but the court dismissed the case, explaining that the outcome of the law was contingent on whether or not voters approved Proposition 31.

    Proponents of Proposition 31 argued that upholding California’s flavored tobacco ban was necessary to prevent kids and teens from getting hooked on nicotine and tobacco products. A 2020 study by the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health found 79% of youth ages 12 to 17 and 89% of adults ages 18 to 24 said they used a tobacco product because it came in flavors they preferred.

    Tobacco companies, including a few listed as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, poured millions of dollars into opposing Proposition 31. Opponents argued that the ban would end up regulating flavored tobacco sales to adults instead of children because it is already illegal for minors to buy tobacco products.

    Attorney General Rob Bonta told The New York Times in a statement that he looks “forward to vigorously defending this important law in court.” Bonta, alongside San Diego District Attorney Summer Stephan, are listed as defendants in the lawsuit.


    TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT CITIZENS JOURNAL  Please keep us publishing – DONATE

     

    - Advertisement -

    1 COMMENT

    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    1 Comment
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Ray Blattel
    Ray Blattel
    18 days ago

    My response to this would be to ban ALL tobacco products. Is there not sufficient evidence that tobacco products are just one of the many causes of cancer and other diseases and are highly addictive? There is only one reason that this hasn’t happened long ago. Cannot Eastern states grow anything but tobacco?

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    1
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x